May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Study of the Progression of Adult Nearsightedness (SPAN): Design and Baseline Findings
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.A. Bullimore
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • L.A. Jones
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • G.L. Mitchell
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • K.S. Reuter
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • M.J. Rah
    New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.A. Bullimore, None; L.A. Jones, None; G.L. Mitchell, None; K.S. Reuter, None; M.J. Rah, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01–EY12952 and R24–EY14792
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2737. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.A. Bullimore, L.A. Jones, G.L. Mitchell, K.S. Reuter, M.J. Rah; Study of the Progression of Adult Nearsightedness (SPAN): Design and Baseline Findings . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2737.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:The Study of Progression of Adult Nearsightedness (SPAN) is a five–year cohort study to determine the risk factors associated with adult myopia progression, particularly the amount of near activities undertaken. Methods:Subjects were recruited from the faculty and staff of the Ohio State University and attended for a baseline examination. Subjects will attend for five annual follow–up visits. Progression is defined as increase in myopia of at least –0.75 D spherical equivalent as determined by cycloplegic auto–refraction. Annual testing includes visual acuity, non–cycloplegic auto–refraction and auto–keratometry, phoria, accommodative lag, response AC/A ratio, cycloplegic auto–refraction, videophakometry, ultrasound, and partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster). Participants’ near activities are assessed using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Subjects carry a pager for two one–week periods and are paged randomly throughout the day. Each time they are paged, they dial into an automated telephone survey and report their activity at that time. Results:Three–hundred ninety–six employees of the Ohio State University were enrolled in SPAN. The mean age is 30.7±3.5 years, 68% are female, 80% are Caucasian, and 77% have worn contact lenses. The mean level of myopia (MSE) is –3.50 ± 1.8 D, the mean axial length by IOL Master is 24.6 ± 1.1 mm, and subjects 1.6 ± 4.0 Δ exophoric. The mean subject response rate for the first week of ESM was 90.3% (range: 7.1% to 100%). Thirty–five percent of the subjects responded to all 56 pages. The most frequently reported visual task was computer use (mean, 18.2%; range, 0 to 59.2%). On average subjects reported reading 10.4% of the time (range, 0% to 37.7%). Other common tasks included distance tasks such as driving (14.2%), social interactions (12.0%), and TV (10.4%). Overall, subjects reported near work activity 43.8% of the time (range, 12.5% to 87.3%). Conclusions:Subjects are being followed for five years. The ESM response rates and variation in near work should allow us to evaluate near work as a risk factor for adult myopia progression.

Keywords: myopia • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment • refractive error development 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×