May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Detecting age–related macular degeneration in digital images vs film images
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.M. Meuer
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Univ of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • S.E. Moss
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Univ of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • R. Klein
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Univ of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • B.E. K. Klein
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Univ of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.M. Meuer, None; S.E. Moss, None; R. Klein, None; B.E.K. Klein, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY06594
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3046. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.M. Meuer, S.E. Moss, R. Klein, B.E. K. Klein; Detecting age–related macular degeneration in digital images vs film images . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3046.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare gradings of lesions associated with age–related macular degeneration (AMD) from digital and stereoscopic film images. Methods: Sixty two people were recruited to have retinal images of the disc and the macula captured in both eyes through nonpharmacologically dilated pupils (NPD) and pharmacologically dilated pupils (PD) using a 45° digital camera (6.3 megapixels). In addition, 30° stereoscopic retinal film images were taken through pharmacologically dilated pupils of the same eyes (N=124). All images were graded for drusen size, type and area, pigmentary abnormalities, geographic atrophy and exudative lesions by masked graders using the Wisconsin Age–Related Maculopathy Grading Scheme. Exact agreement and unweighted kappa scores were calculated for gradings resulting from digital and film images. Results: When categorizing AMD as none, early and late, agreement was best between digital (PD) and film images both taken through a dilated pupil (exact agreement (EA) = 91%, kappa = 0.85, standard error (SE) = 0.05). Agreement for grades from NPD images compared to dilated film images was also good (EA = 80%, kappa = 0.69, SE = 0.06) as was agreement for the grades from digital images captured both ways (NPD vs PD – EA = 85%, kappa = 0.77, SE = 0.05). 

Kappa scores for specific lesions were best when comparing grades from digital and film images taken through a pharmacologically dilated pupil. However, the comparability was similar for most pair–wise comparisons. When disagreement was present between film gradings and gradings from digital images, either before or after pharmacological dilation, it was most often due to ungradable lesions in the digital images. Conclusions: Gradings resulting from high resolution digital images, especially when the pupil is dilated, are highly comparable to those resulting from film based images. We conclude that digital imaging of the retina is useful for epidemiological studies of AMD.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • age–related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×