May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Effect of Ginkgo Biloba on the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential Responses in Patients with Normal Tension Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Thienprasiddhi
    New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • D.C. Hood
    Columbia University, New York, NY
  • J.M. Liebmann
    Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, New York, NY
  • R. Ritch
    New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Thienprasiddhi, None; D.C. Hood, Zeiss C; J.M. Liebmann, None; R. Ritch, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grant EY02115
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3291. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Thienprasiddhi, D.C. Hood, J.M. Liebmann, R. Ritch; Effect of Ginkgo Biloba on the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential Responses in Patients with Normal Tension Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3291.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine whether Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) can improve the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) responses in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Methods: Seventeen normal tension glaucoma patients with maximum recorded intraocular pressure ≤ 21 mmHg were enrolled in this study. Patients received GBE (Vitamin Research Products, Inc. Carson City, NV) 120 mg bid for a period of 1 month after the baseline mfVEP was taken. The mfVEPs were obtained from each eye using a pattern–reversal dartboard array, 44.5 deg in diameter, and containing 60 sectors. Recording electrodes were placed at the inion (I) and 4 cm above the inion, and also at two lateral locations up 1 cm and over 4 cm from I [1]. The mfVEP was repeated after GBE treatment and responses were compared to the baseline. The ratios of the mfVEP amplitudes between the two days (GBE / baseline) were calculated for each location and compared to normal variation [2]. The average of ratios from 60 locations were also calculated and compared to normal variation. Results: Of the 2040 (60 responses x 34 eyes) pairs of responses, 114 (6%) showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in amplitudes and 109 (5%) showed a significant decrease in amplitudes. The average of the ratios (GBE / baseline) for each eye of all patients did not exceed the confidence levels for test–retest variation in normal subjects [2]. Conclusions: GBE did not improve the overall mfVEP responses in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Ref. 1.Hood et al (2002) Arch Ophthalmol. 2. Chen et al (2003) J Glaucoma.

Keywords: electrophysiology: clinical • visual fields • VEI 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×