May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
The Effect of Pupil Dilation on Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Cornea Compensation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E.Z. Blumenthal
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • A. Horani
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • S. Frenkel
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  E.Z. Blumenthal, Laser Diagnostic Technologies F; A. Horani, None; S. Frenkel, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3311. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E.Z. Blumenthal, A. Horani, S. Frenkel; The Effect of Pupil Dilation on Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Cornea Compensation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3311.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Scanning laser polarimetry is routinely performed through a non–dilated pupil, since scanning through dilated pupils might contribute to off–axis scanning, and hence, erroneous cornea compensation, reducing test accuracy and reproducibility. We tested the feasibility and reproducibility of scanning through dilated pupils. Methods: One eye each, of 36 subjects (12 normal, 12 glaucoma suspects and 12 glaucoma patients) was scanned using the GDx with a variable cornea compensator (GDx–VCC). Two scans prior to, and two scans after dilation were performed on each study eye, resetting the cornea compensation prior to each of the scans. Each of 5 GDx parameters was evaluated separately, comparing the two pre–dilation to the two post–dilation scans. Results: Of the 5 GDx–VCC parameters evaluated, none showed a statistically significant difference when comparing the pre– to the post–dilation measurements. The two groups showed a high pre– to post–dilation correlation: 98%, 98%, 98%, 93%, and 95% for The Number, TSNIT Avg, TSNIT SD, Superior Avg, and Inferior Avg, respectively. Under 5% of the measurement variability was attributed to changes in pupil size (R–squared: 0.024 to 0.047). Stratifying the data by diagnostic groups yielded similar results. Conclusions: Pharmacological mydriasis does not appear to significantly alter the RNFL measurements acquired using the GX–VCC instrument. Scanning dilated patients using the GDx–VCC produced results found to be comparable to scans achieved in the same eyes prior to dilation.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×