May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
The benefits and pitfalls of protective DNA vaccination against experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.K. Agarwal
    Lab. of Immunology, NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
  • P.B. Silver
    Lab. of Immunology, NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
  • S.–B. Su
    Lab. of Immunology, NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
  • C.–C. Chan
    Lab. of Immunology, NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
  • R.R. Caspi
    Lab. of Immunology, NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.K. Agarwal, None; P.B. Silver, None; S. Su, None; C. Chan, None; R.R. Caspi, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3443. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.K. Agarwal, P.B. Silver, S.–B. Su, C.–C. Chan, R.R. Caspi; The benefits and pitfalls of protective DNA vaccination against experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3443.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: We have been exploring DNA vaccination to retinal autoantigen, IRBP, as preventive therapy against EAU, a Th1 mediated disease, which serves as a model of human uveitis. Methods: Mice vaccinated hydrodynamically with 10 µg IRBP–DNA were protected from EAU development induced by a subsequent uveitogenic challenge with IRBP protein in adjuvant for at least 10 weeks. Results: Mice vaccinated with 80 µg DNA, although similarly protected from active induction of EAU, developed a low grade, transient ocular inflammation from vaccination alone. Antigen–specific responses of vaccinated, but unchallenged, mice 6 weeks after vaccination showed a measurable IFN–γ response to IRBP in the high–dose, but not in the low–dose vaccinated animals. Antigen–specific IFN–γ production after EAU challenge was reduced in animals protected either by high or by low dose vaccination. Conclusion: These data suggest that while DNA vaccination can be protective from actively induced EAU, it may carry an element of risk. Careful optimization of treatment dose can help to retain the protective effect of the vaccine, while minimizing the risk of side effects.

Keywords: autoimmune disease • immunomodulation/immunoregulation • uveitis–clinical/animal model 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×