May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
The VEP Vernier response and its sensitivity to moderate amblyopia in children.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.I. Chen
    Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool Childrens Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Ophthalmology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • A. Chandna
    Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool Childrens Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • A.M. Norcia
    Infant Vision Laboratory, The Smith–Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
  • D. Stone
    Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool Childrens Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • A. Owen
    Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool Childrens Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.I. Chen, None; A. Chandna, None; A.M. Norcia, None; D. Stone, None; A. Owen, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Guide Dogs for the Blind Association (OR2001–99a)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3490. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.I. Chen, A. Chandna, A.M. Norcia, D. Stone, A. Owen; The VEP Vernier response and its sensitivity to moderate amblyopia in children. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3490.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:Vernier and Snellen acuity are well correlated in amblyopia and losses on vernier acuity are often larger than grating acuity. This motivates attempts to develop vernier acuity tests for pre–verbal children. One method uses the swept parameter VEP to estimate the acuity threshold by extrapolating the response function to zero signal amplitude. Here we examined the entire response function over large supra–threshold ranges for both vernier and grating sweeps. Methods:Sweep VEP response functions for 4 stimuli were averaged across 39 amblyopic children (mean age 55 mo) and 19 normal children (mean 64 mo). Grating stimuli were swept between 32 and 2 c/deg using 7.51 Hz pattern–reversal, 3.76 Hz and 15 Hz on–off modulation. The vernier alignment/misalignment grating was swept from 0.5 to 8 arcmin and was presented at 3.76 Hz. Results:Mean amblyopic optotype acuity was 0.55 logMAR and mean interocular acuity difference was 0.39 logMAR. Group response functions for all grating acuity measures did not differ between amblyopic and fellow eyes or between normal and amblyopic eyes. In contrast, vernier response functions became progressively different between fellow and amblyopic eyes as the size of the offset increased. Conclusions:Compared with an analysis based on thresholds alone, it is likely that multivariate analysis of the vernier VEP response incorporating both the slope and the extrapolated threshold of the function will more accurately differentiate the normal from abnormal state, as well as possess more sensitivity and specificity for amblyopia.

Keywords: amblyopia • visual acuity • visual cortex 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×