May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Accommodative lag at the onset of myopia in children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.O. Mutti
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • G.L. Mitchell
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • L.A. Jones
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • J.R. Hayes
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • M.L. Moeschberger
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • K. Zadnik
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.O. Mutti, None; G.L. Mitchell, None; L.A. Jones, None; J.R. Hayes, None; M.L. Moeschberger, None; K. Zadnik, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH and Office of Minority Research U10 EY08893, R21 EY12273, EF Wildermuth Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3514. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.O. Mutti, G.L. Mitchell, L.A. Jones, J.R. Hayes, M.L. Moeschberger, K. Zadnik; Accommodative lag at the onset of myopia in children . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3514.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Defocus from accommodative lag is a putative risk factor for the onset and/or progression of myopia in children. Previously we have shown that while prevalent myopes have increased accommodative lag, greater amounts of lag were not associated with any increased risk of developing myopia (Mutti et al., ARVO, 2002). If increased lag accompanies but does not precede the onset of myopia, when does accommodative lag become different in children who develop myopia compared to those who remain emmetropic? Methods: The age of onset of myopia (–0.75 D or more myopic in each principal meridian) was identified in 102 children between the ages of 6 and 13 years participating in the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia (OLSM) between 1997 and 2000. Accommodative lag to a 4.00 D stimulus measured annually before and after the onset of myopia was compared to age–matched predicted values of lag from a model derived from 47 OLSM children who were always emmetropic (between –0.25 D and +1.00 D). Lag measurements were included in the analysis only if the accommodative response was at least 1 D. Results: Mean accommodative lag for children who became myopic was not significantly different from those who remained emmetropic one year prior to myopia onset and at the year of myopia onset (mean differences = 0.053 D and –0.013 D; P = 0.50 and 0.84, respectively, one sample t–tests). Lag was significantly higher in children who became myopic compared to those who remained emmetropic by two years following the onset year by 0.33 D (P = 0.0049, one sample t–test). One year prior to myopia onset and at the year of myopia onset, statistical power to find an average difference in lag of 0.20 D between children who became myopic and those who remained emmetropic was 0.72 and 0.87, respectively. Conclusions: Increased accommodative lag occurs after onset as a later feature of myopia. Therefore, it is unlikely that accommodative lag will be a useful predictive factor for the onset of myopia.

Keywords: myopia • refractive error development • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×