May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
A comparison of methods for predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Vianya–Estopa
    Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • W.A. Douthwaite
    Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • K. Pesudovs
    Department of Optometry, UH College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • B.A. Noble
    Department of Ophthalmology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • D.B. Elliott
    Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Vianya–Estopa, None; W.A. Douthwaite, None; K. Pesudovs, None; B.A. Noble, None; D.B. Elliott, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3738. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Vianya–Estopa, W.A. Douthwaite, K. Pesudovs, B.A. Noble, D.B. Elliott; A comparison of methods for predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3738.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To compare the ability of various tests used for predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery. Methods:130 patients have been examined pre–operatively to date (mean age, 76.4 ± 8.9 yrs). Measurements included Critical Flicker/Fusion Frequency (CFF), Optimal Reading Speed, Displacement Threshold Hyperacuity (DTH), Super–illuminated Pinhole, PAM and Interferometry. Follow–up visits were conducted at least 8 weeks post–operatively. At present, post–operative data is available from 48 patients, 32 of these were cataract only patients, 9 of the subjects had cataract and ARMD, 6 subjects had cataract and POAG and 1 amblyope subject had cataract with ARMD. All subjects underwent successful phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Results:Mean pre–operative visual acuity was 0.45 ± 0.40 (Snellen equivalent 20/57) with a post–operative mean value of 0.14 ± 0.21 (Snellen equivalent 20/28). Scatterplots comparing pre– (y axis) and post–operative (x axis) data for 48 subjects produced the following results: CFF (r2 = 0.77, y = 0.88x + 4.76); Optimal Reading Speed (r2 = 0.45, y = 0.98x – 14.07); Super–illuminated Pinhole (r2 = 0.35, y = 0.67x + 0.22); DTH (r2 = 0.06, y = 0.42x + 76.50); Interferometry (r2 = 0.04, y = 0.35x + 0.21) and PAM (r2 = 0.03, y = 0.26 x + 0.22). Conclusions:The coefficients of determination indicate the degree of association between pre– and post–operative performance. This is poor for PAM and Interferometry. The association and therefore the predictability of the other tests are better with CFF being particularly good.

Keywords: cataract • age–related macular degeneration • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×