May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
CORNEAL BIOTOLERANCE OF DIFFERENT BIOADHESIVES: COMPARATIVE STUDY
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.E. Mulet
    Research & Development, Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
    Ophthalmology Dept, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
  • J.L. Alio
    Research & Development, Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
    Ophthalmology Dept, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
  • A. Artola
    Research & Development, Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
    Ophthalmology Dept, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
  • A. Sanchez
    Ophthalmology Dept, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
  • M. Mahiques
    Research & Development, Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • J. Javaloy
    Research & Development, Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • J. Merayo
    Instituto de Oftalmobiologia Aplicada, Valladolid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.E. Mulet, None; J.L. Alio, None; A. Artola, None; A. Sanchez, None; M. Mahiques, None; J. Javaloy, None; J. Merayo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Spanish MoH C03/13
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 3850. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.E. Mulet, J.L. Alio, A. Artola, A. Sanchez, M. Mahiques, J. Javaloy, J. Merayo; CORNEAL BIOTOLERANCE OF DIFFERENT BIOADHESIVES: COMPARATIVE STUDY . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):3850.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To study the efficacy and the clinical and histological corneal biotolerance of different bioadhesives Methods:We carried out an "in vitro" study on animal eyes of different bioadhesives with an acrylic or biological base. 150µ lamellar keratectomy was performed with Moria I microkeratome and the corneal lamella was sealed with different bioadhesives. We evaluated effectiveness, speed and hardness of polimerization and corneal transparency. We made an "in vivo" study on Albino New Zealand rabbits (4 eyes per group) evaluating corneal biotolerance (inflammation reaction, neovascularization, opacification) and histological findings. We performed a 5mm intrastromal dissection with Melles spatula and microsclerotome and injected 0.10 mm of the different adhesives: n–butyl cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®, Tisuacryl®), n–butyl cyanoacrylate ethyl cyanoacetate, n–butyl cyanoacrylate dihexyl maleate and fibrin adhesive (tissucol®) 3 months follow up. Results:The bioadhesives from greatest to least in terms of degree of hardness, speed of polimerization and corneal opacity were: Histoacryl®– n–butyl cyanoacrylate dihexyl maleate – n–butyl cyanoacrylate ethyl cyanoacetate, Tisuacryl®– tissucol®. Efficacy: All were effective except fibrin adhesive. Inflammatory reaction: Severe: Histoacryl® and n–butyl cyanoacrylate dihexyl maleate and n–butyl cyanoacrylate ethyl cyanoacetate. Mild: Tisuacryl® and Minimal/no reaction: fibrin adhesives. Histological findings: Presence of edema, fibroblast activation, new vessel formation and remains of bioadhesives. Conclusions:Acrylic bioadhesives can be an effective alternative to sutures for corneal lamellar sealing. Corneal opacification may be produced by different compounds of the bioadhesive mixture. We need more experimental studies to determine the bioadhesive that can substitute traditional sutures in lamellar keratoplasty.

Keywords: ocular irritancy/toxicity testing • inflammation • anterior segment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×