May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Development of a Flexible, Microfabricated Retinal Interface
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N.Z. Mehenti
    Chemical Engineering,
    Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • M.F. Marmor
    Ophthalmology,
    Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • M.S. Blumenkranz
    Ophthalmology,
    Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • S.F. Bent
    Chemical Engineering,
    Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • H.A. Fishman
    Ophthalmology,
    Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N.Z. Mehenti, None; M.F. Marmor, None; M.S. Blumenkranz, VISX, Inc. F, P; S.F. Bent, None; H.A. Fishman, VISX, Inc. F, P.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4186. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N.Z. Mehenti, M.F. Marmor, M.S. Blumenkranz, S.F. Bent, H.A. Fishman; Development of a Flexible, Microfabricated Retinal Interface . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4186.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Rigid, silicon–based retinal prostheses have produced visual sensations in blind subjects, but a flexible interface would provide more intimate and consistent contact with surviving retinal elements, and thereby allow higher visual resolution with lower power requirements. Our purpose is to use soft materials microfabrication technologies to develop flexible retinal chip interfaces that can achieve both electrical and neurotransmitter–based stimulation. Methods: Soft materials microfabrication methods with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) were applied to design retinal interfaces based on electrical or chemical stimulation. Polymer micromachining techniques, including etching, metallization, and molding, were developed and optimized to create functional device layers. Spin casting and alignment bonding strategies were incorporated into the fabrication process to produce thin, integrated stimulation devices. Results: Integrated retinal interfaces were developed using PDMS by precisely tailoring the polymer microfabrication processes for the device layers. Electrically–based devices were fabricated using etching and metallization to deposit flexible, functional electrodes in a patterned array. Chemically–based devices employed microfabricated apertures in a thin membrane through which neurotransmitters could be controllably ejected from an underlying microfluidic channel. Both the microaperture diameter and membrane thickness could be controlled to a few microns, so that high–resolution stimulation as well as rapid delivery times could be achieved. Conclusions: Flexible retinal prosthetic chips are feasible and may allow for higher resolution stimulation as well as lower power requirements than achieved by current rigid devices. Our technology could potentially be extended to neural prosthetics in general.

Keywords: age–related macular degeneration • neurotransmitters/neurotransmitter systems • retinal connections, networks, circuitry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×