May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
THE EFFECT OF HYPOXIA ON THE MULTIFOCAL ERG AND MULTIFOCAL OCILLATORY POTENTIALS IN HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Klemp
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
  • B. Sander
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
  • M. Larsen
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Klemp, None; B. Sander, None; M. Larsen, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4232. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Klemp, B. Sander, M. Larsen; THE EFFECT OF HYPOXIA ON THE MULTIFOCAL ERG AND MULTIFOCAL OCILLATORY POTENTIALS IN HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4232.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the effect of hypoxia on the human multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and multifocal oscillatory potentials (mfOP). Methods: In 10 eyes of 10 healthy volunteers, mfERGs were recorded during hypoxia and normal oxygenation. Hypoxia was induced by inhalation of a 10% O2 and 90% N2 gas mixture, reducing mean blood oxygenation from 98.8 to 69.4%. To insure a stable systemic level of oxygenation, patients breathed the gas mixture for a period of 5 min before and during the recording period. 61 retinal areas were stimulated by a Veris 4 system and each pseudorandom multifocal flash was followed by 3 dark frames to allow derivation of oscillatory potentials. First– and second–order ERG kernels were derived from each area and analyzed for averages from 5 concentric rings. To test for response asymmetries, an additional analysis was made for averages of a central and 8 peripheral regions (mixed–model analysis, SAS Institute). Results: Hypoxia significantly decreased mean first–order P1 and N2 amplitudes averaged from 5 concentric rings: P1 amplitudes from ring 1(central response) decreased by 36.1% (51.3 nV/deg2) and amplitudes from ring 2–5 decreased by 18.9 to 25.6%. The mixed–model analysis confirmed this effect. Both analyses showed a larger effect of hypoxia on central responses than on peripheral responses. Hypoxia reduced the mean amplitude of mfOPs. Conclusions: The mfERG is highly sensitive to moderate hypoxia. Sensitivity to hypoxia varies significantly with retinal eccentricity.

Keywords: electrophysiology: non–clinical • hypoxia • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×