May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Constant light produces more optical aberration especially overcorrected spherical aberrations in chickens
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Mihashi
    Technical Research Institute, Topcon Corporation, Itabashi–Ku, Japan
  • T. Li
    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
  • J.R. Basarab
    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
  • Y. Hirohara
    Technical Research Institute, Topcon Corporation, Itabashi–Ku, Japan
  • H.C. Howland
    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T. Mihashi, Topcon Corporation E, P; T. Li, None; J.R. Basarab, None; Y. Hirohara, Topcon Corporation E, P; H.C. Howland, Topcon Corporation C, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY02994
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4301. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Mihashi, T. Li, J.R. Basarab, Y. Hirohara, H.C. Howland; Constant light produces more optical aberration especially overcorrected spherical aberrations in chickens . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4301.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Chickens grown in constant light exhibit flattened corneas, shallow anterior chambers and hyperopia (Li, Troilo, Glasser and Howland (1995) Vision Res). A question addressed here was whether the optical aberrations of chicken eyes are also affected by constant light conditions. Methods: Twelve eyes of six chicks in constant light conditions (CL) and ten eyes of five chicks in normal light conditions (normal) were measured for refraction and wavefront aberrations 28 days after hatching. Wavefront aberrations were measured using a Shack–Hartmann wavefront aberrometer. The alignment of the eye to the aberrometer was objectively checked using the first Purkinje reflex and images of the pupil of the eye. This mage of the anterior segment was grabbed simultaneously with the Hartmann image. Wavefront aberrations for a 3.5 mm pupil were obtained and analyzed using Zernike polynomials of which the coordinate origin was the center of the pupil. A line through the nasal corner of the eye to the center of the pupil was chosen to be horizontal axis. During measurements, chicks, without lid retractors, were held gently by the authors in order not to distort the cornea. Results: Higher–order aberrations of normal chicks (average ±SD; 0.250 ± 0.047µ) were smaller than those of CL chicks, which were 0.704±0.100 (P<0.001, t–test). Combined RMSs of the 3rd–,4th–, 5th–, and 6th–order wavefront aberrations in CL chicks were also statistically significantly larger than those in normal chicks. Only the Zernike coefficients of oblique astigmatism, 3rd order coma, and 4th order spherical aberration showed significant differences between CL and normal chicks. The average of 4th order spherical aberration in CL chicks was –0.522µ and that in normal chicks was –0.094µ. This overcorrected spherical aberration was due to either the smaller curvature of CL or to the more prolate surface than normal. Conclusions: Higher–order aberrations of normal chicks 28 days after hatching were larger than those of normal human eyes (0.250µ > 1.753/100 = 0.054µ). Astigmatism and higher–order aberrations were increased by CL conditions as expected from corneal flattening.

Keywords: optical properties • emmetropization • refractive error development 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×