May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Effects of Font Type, Smoothing, and Stroke Width on Legibility
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.V. Subbaram
    Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • J.E. Sheedy
    Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • J.R. Hayes
    Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.V. Subbaram, Microsoft, USA F; J.E. Sheedy, Microsoft, USA F; J.R. Hayes, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Microsoft, USA
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4354. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.V. Subbaram, J.E. Sheedy, J.R. Hayes; Effects of Font Type, Smoothing, and Stroke Width on Legibility . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4354.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The objective of this study was to measure the effects of font smoothing font type, and stroke width upon legibility. Methods:Thirty subjects (age 18 to 35 years), with best–corrected acuity of 20/20 or better participated in the study. Capital letter, lower case letter and lower case word legibility were measured with 6 fonts (Georgia, Times New Roman, Plantin, Verdana, Arial, and Franklin), 3 font smoothing modes (none, gray scale and ClearType), and 4 stroke widths of Franklin Gothic font. Visual acuity was measured on each subject for the various parameter combinations, using stepped viewing distances to create acuity line steps. The mean visual acuity of the subject group for each condition represents the relative legibility for the condition. All testing was performed using a 12–pt font (block size) on an LCD screen. Main effects and interaction effects were tested for statistical significance with repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Upper case letters were more legible than lower case letters (p<0.0001) and lower case words were 10% less legible than their component individual letters. Font smoothing affected legibility (p<0.0001), ClearType was more legible than gray scale. Font type had a significant effect on legibility (p<0.0001). Legibility was significantly better with Verdana and Arial fonts than with TNR and Franklin, sans serif fonts were generally more legibility than serif fonts. Thin stroke letters were less legible than the thicker strokes. Significant interaction was measured between font smoothing and font type, the combination of ClearType and Verdana offered greatest legibility. Conclusions:Sans serif fonts had better legibility than serif fonts. Heavier stroke widths were more legible than thin stroke widths. Words were less legible than their component letters.

Keywords: visual acuity • reading 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×