May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Inhibition of the Startle Reflex in Mice by Light Stimulation.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.T. Thliveris
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI
  • P. Quann
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI
  • K. Meddaugh
    McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research and Laboratory of Genetics,
    University Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI
  • J.N. Ver Hoeve
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.T. Thliveris, None; P. Quann, None; K. Meddaugh, None; J.N. Ver Hoeve, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  K08 CA84146–02
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4362. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.T. Thliveris, P. Quann, K. Meddaugh, J.N. Ver Hoeve; Inhibition of the Startle Reflex in Mice by Light Stimulation. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4362.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the feasibility of assessing sensory response in mice using light pre–pulse inhibition of the startle reflex. Methods: The startle reflex was assessed by placing mice in a plexiglass tube resting on an accelerometer plate. The startle stimulus was an intense (105dB) abrupt auditory pulse of white noise. The amplitude of the startle reflex was determined using commercially available software (Med Associates, VT). Brief flashes preceded the startle stimulus on some trials. The ability of the light stimulus to modify the startle response was assessed using a Wilcoxon statistic. Pre–pulse light intensity, lead time, and startle intensity were varied in three strains of 35 – 45 day old mice. Optimal conditions were chosen to screen 30 aged–matched C57BL/6J (B6), 129S6/SvEvTac (129) and the F1 (B6 x 129) mice. Similar tests were carried out using an auditory pre–pulse. Results: All the strains tested exhibited pre–pulse inhibition of the startle reflex with either light or sound. The optimal inter–stimulus interval for inhibition was approximately 100 ms. The amount of light delivered in the pre–pulse correlated to the degree of inhibition. There were differences among strains in the degree of inhibition observed. Conclusions: It is frequently desired to screen genetically altered mice for sensory function. Electrophysiologic testing often may be impractical for large–scale screening. Pre–pulse inhibition of the startle reflex may be a useful tool to screen for mutants in this component of the response to light. Mice can be screened objectively and non–invasively with minimal technical skill. The strain variation demonstrates that light pre–pulse inhibition of the startle reflex is under genetic control.

Keywords: genetics • retinal connections, networks, circuitry • photoreceptors: visual performance 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×