May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Downstream effects of ROCK signaling in cultured human corneal stromal cells: microarray analysis of gene expression.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.A. Harvey
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • S.C. Anderson
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • N. SundarRaj
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.A. Harvey, None; S.C. Anderson, None; N. SundarRaj, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY08098, EY03263
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4548. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.A. Harvey, S.C. Anderson, N. SundarRaj; Downstream effects of ROCK signaling in cultured human corneal stromal cells: microarray analysis of gene expression. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4548.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: ROCK (Rho–associated coiled–coil containing protein kinase) is a downstream target of Rho GTPase signaling, and regulates the assembly of actin–containing stress fibers. The present study identifies ROCK–regulated gene expression in human corneal stromal cells (HCSCs). Methods: HCSCs from each of three different donor eyes were cultured for 48h in DMEM with additions to yield the following designated phenotypes: baseline fibroblasts (10% serum), bFGF–activated fibroblasts (10% serum plus bFGF plus heparin) and myofibroblasts (1 % serum plus TGF–ß1). Cells were then exposed to the ROCK inhibitor Y–27632 or vehicle for 12 hours. Total RNA was extracted, processed and analyzed using either Affymetrix HU95Av2 or HU133A GeneChips. ROCK–supported (i.e., Y–27632–inhibited) and ROCK–suppressed (i.e., Y–27632–enhanced) changes used the following criteria: within each phenotype, minimum ≥ 1.5 fold and mean ≥ 2–fold. For changes across all phenotypes, minimum ≥ 1.25 fold and mean ≥ 1.5 –fold. Results: ROCK supported 4, 3, and 10 transcripts, in the respective phenotypes. In bFGF–activated fibroblasts, ROCK supported ASPM and CENPF (two mitotic–spindle associated products) and ENC1, an actin–associated protein regulating cytoskeletal reorganization. In myofibroblasts, ROCK supported both α– (smooth muscle) and γ– (enteric) isoforms of actin. Combining data for all phenotypes identified ROCK–supported expression of RRM2 (DNA synthesis), the CCNB1–CDC2–CKS2 triad (cell cycle control), ASPM, and three other mitotic spindle associated proteins. ROCK suppressed 14, 12 and 15 transcripts in the respective phenotypes. In myofibroblasts, ROCK suppressed a subset of extracellular matrix (ECM) transcripts: biglycan, perlecan, agrin and adlican. Combining data from all groups identified global suppression of stromal cell derived factor 1, cytosolic phospholipase A2, phosphatidic acid phosphatase 2A, and three other transcripts. In myofibroblasts ROCK supported the expression of TGF–ß2 (the predominant stromal isoform of TGF–ß) but in baseline fibroblasts ROCK suppressed TGF–ß2 expression. Conclusions: These data suggest that ROCK plays an important role in corneal wounding, panphenotypically supporting cell proliferation (DNA synthesis/cell cycle control/mitosis) while modulating both actin and ECM levels in myofibroblasts. By suppressing TGF–ß2 in baseline fibroblasts ROCK will delay the autacoid TGF–ß2 –mediated conversion to myofibroblasts: however once conversion has started, ROCK will accelerate it by supporting myofibroblast output of TGF–ß2.

Keywords: cornea: stroma and keratocytes • wound healing • gene microarray 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×