May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Ocular Prosthetic Management: Evaluation of prospective, serial custom prosthetic refitting on improved socket anatomy, function and cosmesis.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.N. Garonzik
    Prosthetic Eye Institute, Boca Raton, FL
  • R. Margolis
    Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • T.G. Murray
    Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.N. Garonzik, None; R. Margolis, None; T.G. Murray, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4704. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.N. Garonzik, R. Margolis, T.G. Murray; Ocular Prosthetic Management: Evaluation of prospective, serial custom prosthetic refitting on improved socket anatomy, function and cosmesis. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4704.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Ocular prostheses are typically evaluated and replaced at infrequent intervals. Complications of poorly fitting ocular prosthetics include socket and lid contraction, ptosis, forniceal shortening, implant migration, and conjunctival/tenons tissue thinning leading to exposure/extrusion. We evaluated the benefit of prospective, serial prosthetic refitting to reduce socket complications, improve function and enhance cosmesis. Methods: 168 pediatric and adult patients who underwent enucleation and ocular prosthesis fitting were examined. Patients were prospectively evaluated at 4 to 6 month intervals and the following characteristics were graded on a scale of 1 through 5: prosthetic appearance, implant condition, fornices, and functioning ability. Information about the frequency of modification to fit, duration of prosthetic use, type and size of orbital implant were recorded. Statistical analysis evaluated dependent and independent variables correlating frequency of prosthetic refitting with life–table outcomes review. Results: In 168 eyes of 168 patients, we found no incidence of implant extrusion (0/168, 0%) Sockets that underwent aggressive refitting of the prosthesis at least once every 6 months were noted to have improved forniceal function, decreased conjunctival thinning, increased comfort and were graded with enhanced cosmetic appearance (p<.05). Conclusions: This study documents improved socket anatomy, function and enhanced cosmesis associated with serial prosthetic refitting. Prospectively evaluating the patient with an enucleated socket and targeting prosthetic modifications decreases major complications including implant extrusion.

Keywords: orbit • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • anatomy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×