May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
A Comparative Study In a Normal Pediatric Population of the Relative Comfort of Moxifloxacin 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution versus a Tear Substitute
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.S. Wagner
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, UMDNJ – NJ Med School, Newark, NJ
  • P.A. D’Arienzo
    Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, New York, NY
  • S.J. Hallas
    Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc., N. Andover, MA
  • M.B. Thomson
    Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc., N. Andover, MA
  • A.M. Shapiro
    Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc., N. Andover, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.S. Wagner, Alcon C; P.A. D’Arienzo, Alcon C; S.J. Hallas, Alcon C; M.B. Thomson, Alcon C; A.M. Shapiro, Alcon C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4936. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.S. Wagner, P.A. D’Arienzo, S.J. Hallas, M.B. Thomson, A.M. Shapiro; A Comparative Study In a Normal Pediatric Population of the Relative Comfort of Moxifloxacin 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution versus a Tear Substitute . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4936.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Assess the relative comfort and tolerability of moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Vigamox®) versus a tear substitute in a normal pediatric population. Methods: Subject–masked, crossover design, 50 subject, aged 7–17 years study. At baseline all subjects received 1 drop of tear substitute (Tears Naturale® II) in each eye. At least 1 hour later, 1 drop of moxifloxacin was instilled in each eye. Subjects rated drop comfort immediately, 1 minute and 3 minutes after instillation using a 0 to 10 scale where ‘0’ was "very comfortable" to ‘10’ was "severely bad pain." Results: Mean comfort scores for the tear substitute and moxifloxacin were 2.14 and 1.81 immediately after instillation, 0.71 and 0.84 one minute after instillation, and 0.41 and 0.46 three minutes after instillation, respectively. No clinically or statistically significant differences in mean comfort were found between treatment groups (P > 0.05 at all time points). Conclusions: Moxifloxacin was as comfortable as a tear substitute in a normal pediatric population. Moxifloxacin does not contain benzalkonium chloride and has a near–neutral pH of 6.8. These attributes contribute to moxifloxacin’s comfort and tolerability in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Since moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum, is a fourth generation fluoroquinolone, and has been found to be as comfortable as a tear substitute, it can readily be hypothesized that its comfort and convenient three–times daily dosing regimen will lead to greater pediatric patient compliance.

Keywords: antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×