May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Outcomes in Anisometropia Treatment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.T. Volikas
    Ophthalmology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
  • J. O'Neill
    University Ophthalmic Consultants, Washington, DC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.T. Volikas, None; J. O'Neill, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 4994. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.T. Volikas, J. O'Neill; Outcomes in Anisometropia Treatment . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):4994.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To identify prognostic factors in the treatment of amblyopia caused by anisometropia in children. Methods:A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients treated for anisometropia at a referral based ophthalmology practice. Inclusion criteria was age less than 18 years old at identification of anisometropia and anisometropia identified a difference of greater than 1.5 D of hyperopia or astigmatism or 3.0 D of myopia between the two eyes. 71 patients were included of which 61 had sufficient follow–up for examination. Of the 61 patients followed, all were treated with glasses. 37 patients were further treated with patching and, of these 37, five were treated with atropine penalization. Results:1. The population was divided into three cohorts based on age at presentation: ··Ages 0 to 4 years: Acuity improved from an average of 20/68 to 20/41, a 2.79 line improvement. 11 of 15 (73.3%) finished with an acuity of 20/40 or better. ··Ages 4 to 7 years: Acuity improved from an average of 20/69 to 20/45, a 2.32 line improvement. 15 of 27 (55.6%) finished with an acuity of 20/40 or better. ··Ages 7+ years: Acuity improved from an average of 20/45 to 20/29, a 1.62 line improvement. 15 of 19 (78.9%) finished with an acuity of 20/40 or better. 2. The population was divided into three cohorts based on type of anisometropia: ··Pure Hyperopic: Acuity improved from an average of 20/60 to 20/34, a 2.58 line improvement. 23 of 32 (71.9%) exhibited an acuity of 20/40 or better at their final visit. ··Pure Myopic: Acuity improved from an average of 20/64 to 20/49, a 1.50 line improvement. 6 of 11 (54.5%) exhibited an acuity of 20/40 or better at their final visit. ··Simple or Compound Astigmatism: Acuity improved from an average of 20/62 to 20/41, a 2.01 line improvement. 12 of 18 (66.7%) exhibited an acuity of 20/40 or better at their final visit. Conclusions:1. Based on age, there appears to be no statistical significant difference in degree of improvement between the youngest (ages 0 to 4 years) and middle (4 to 7 years) cohorts. The oldest cohort showed the least improvement, but had the best baseline acuity of all groups. 2. Based on refractive error, the purely hyperopic anisometrope group showed the greatest level of improvement and this was significant to a level of P<0.2. The hyperopes also demonstrated the highest percentage of patients achieving 20/40 or better vision. This indicates that there is a greater benefit to be achieved from aggressively identifying and treating children with anisometropia due to large amounts of hyperopic differences.

Keywords: amblyopia • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×