May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Aqueous Humor and Iris Mechanics in Pupillary Block and Primary Angle–Closure Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V.H. Barocas
    Biomedical Engineering,
    Univ of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • E.C. Huang
    Chemical Engineering,
    Univ of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.H. Barocas, None; E.C. Huang, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Whitaker Foundation Biomedical Engineering Research Grant, UMN Supercomputing Institute
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5033. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V.H. Barocas, E.C. Huang; Aqueous Humor and Iris Mechanics in Pupillary Block and Primary Angle–Closure Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5033.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the various risk factors for angle–closure glaucoma (ACG) in light of mechanical interactions between aqueous humor and iris. Methods: We extended our previous computer models to include active contraction of the iris sphincter and calculated iris contours based on the following risk factors: anterior chamber diameter, lens curvature, and iris–zonule distance. Anterior chamber depth, often identified as a risk factor, was not varied directly but changed indirectly as a result of the other factors. Changes in angle and Mapstone's "pupil blocking force" were calculated. Results: Greater lens curvature and shorter iris–zonule distance contributed significantly to pupillary block and the associated narrowing of the angle while a smaller anterior chamber diameter contributed to susceptibility to angle closure. Anterior chamber depth decreased with increasing severity of angle closure (p < 0.001) but did not differentiate among different mechanisms. Surprisingly, the model predicted maximum pupillary block and angle closure at the minimum pupil dilation, contradicting the clinical observation that angle closure is most severe in dark conditions. Conclusions: Our analysis, based on Mapstone's classic work, is consistent with observed risk factors but not with light–dark behavior. We believe that a dynamic effect, not captured by our steady–state model, is responsible for the observed increase in angle closure severity in low light.

Keywords: aqueous • iris 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×