May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Light rise of the EOG compared with light rise of the photopic flash ERG
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.P. Hagan
    Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • M.C. Brown
    Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • B. Lowry
    Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.P. Hagan, None; M.C. Brown, None; B. Lowry, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5096. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.P. Hagan, M.C. Brown, B. Lowry; Light rise of the EOG compared with light rise of the photopic flash ERG . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5096.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To determine if the magnitude of the rise in B–wave amplitude of the ISCEV standard flash photopic ERG occurring during light adaptation is related to the light rise in the corneo–retinal potential as seen in the standard EOG procedure, in a variety of pathological disorders usually investigated by EOG/ERG. Methods:17 subjects referred for electro–diagnostic tests including EOG/ERG, had the standard photopic flash ERG performed twice, once at the end of the EOG procedure (after 15 minutes light adaptation) at 68cd/m2, and again after 20 minutes dark adaptation. Provisional diagnoses for these subjects included retinitis pigmentosa (6), Usher’s syndrome (2), adult vitelliform dystrophy (2), CSNB (1), pattern dystrophy (1), toxic retinopathy (1), none (4) (of which 2 had nyctalopia, 1 constricted field, 1 poor VA). For each eye the ratio of the photopic ERG B–wave amplitude after light adaptation, to the amplitude before adaptation was calculated (ERG light rise), and compared with the EOG light rise (Arden ratio) for the same eye. Results:ERG light rises had a mean ratio of 2.12 (SD 0.72 range 1.0–4.1), and EOG light rise had a mean Arden ratio of 1.72 (SD 0.43 range 1.0–2.4). However, there was no significant correlation between the two ratios (Pearson coefficient r2 = 0.015). Interestingly, two subjects had no ERG light rise, even though there was an EOG light rise, albeit subnormal (∼1.4). Conclusions:The rise in photopic ERG B–wave amplitude occurring during light adaptation appears to be independent of the EOG light rise, suggesting different underlying physiological mechanisms.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • electrophysiology: clinical • retinal pigment epithelium 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×