May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
REGULATION OF PHOTORECEPTOR GENE EXPRESSION BY MICROENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.L. Bradford
    The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • D.J. Zack
    The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • R. Adler
    The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.L. Bradford, None; D.J. Zack, None; R. Adler, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by NIH (EY04959 and EY1765), Research to Prevent Blindness, Foundation Fighting Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5304. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.L. Bradford, D.J. Zack, R. Adler; REGULATION OF PHOTORECEPTOR GENE EXPRESSION BY MICROENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5304.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: We previously reported that various photoreceptor–specific genes show dissimilar temporal and/or spatial patterns of expression, suggesting that they may be regulated through different mechanisms. We have now tested this hypothesis by investigating the effects of growth factors and second messenger molecules on the expression of visual pigments and other photoreceptor–specific genes. Methods: At embryonic day (ED) 5–6, when photoreceptors are being generated, retinas were isolated from chick embryos, dissociated, and grown in low–density cultures either in control medium or in the presence of CNTF, activin, or staurosporin. After 4 days in vitro the cultures were analyzed by in situ hybridization (ISH), RT–PCR and real time PCR for the expression of visual pigments and other photoreceptor–specific genes involved in phototransduction, retinoid metabolism and outer segment formation. Results: The calcium–binding protein visinin was detected by ISH in nearly all cultured photoreceptors under each of the conditions tested. In control cultures, the red cone pigment (iodopsin) was practically the only VP detected by ISH, being present in over 50% of the photoreceptors; the green pigment was seldom seen by ISH, but was detectable by PCR. Staurosporin, a protein kinase inhibitor, caused induction of rhodopsin expression, accompanied by a suppression of iodopsin expression. Iodopsin expression was also suppressed by activin, but without concomitant changes in rhodopsin. Green mRNA levels increased 10 fold in CNTF treated cultures, becoming detectable by ISH in over 50% of the photoreceptors; it appeared co–expressed with iodopsin in some cells. Most of the remaining photoreceptor–specific genes investigated under the various experimental conditions failed to show changes equivalent to, or correlated with, those observed for visual pigment genes. Conclusions: The data show that CNTF, activin, and modulators of protein kinase activity have powerful but dissimilar effects on different photoreceptor subtypes, and support the notion that various photoreceptor–specific genes are independently regulated through different mechanisms.

Keywords: gene/expression • color pigments and opsins • signal transduction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×