May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Comparison of Reproducibility and Variability between OCT–3 version 1 and OCT–3 version 2
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.M. Feldman
    Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical School–Houston, Houston, TX
  • H.J. Kim
    Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical School–Houston, Houston, TX
  • A.Z. Chuang
    Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical School–Houston, Houston, TX
  • N.P. Bell
    Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical School–Houston, Houston, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.M. Feldman, None; H.J. Kim, None; A.Z. Chuang, None; N.P. Bell, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, T35 DK007676–11
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5496. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.M. Feldman, H.J. Kim, A.Z. Chuang, N.P. Bell; Comparison of Reproducibility and Variability between OCT–3 version 1 and OCT–3 version 2 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5496.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:Changes in the optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nervefiber layers (RNFL) can be quantitatively monitored using animaging device called optical coherence tomography (OCT). Thelatest OCT–3 version 2 contains modifications to the softwaredesigned to improve reproducibility in RNFL measurements. Toevaluate these improvements, data from OCT–3 version 2were compared for reproducibility and variability to those ofOCT–3 version 1.Methods: The cross–sectional images of the RNFL from 16subjects (9 normal, 7 glaucoma) obtained from version 1 werereanalyzed using the new software and intra and inter observervariability calculated. The calculations were compared to thoseof the old software by using Shrout Fleiss coefficients to determineif a significant difference in reproducibility existed betweenthe two versions. Paired t–tests were utilized to establishwhich variables should be considered for use in following glaucomaResults: Overall, OCT–3 version 2 showed higher reproducibilitythan OCT–3 version 1 as indicated by Table 1. For allsubjects, RNFL thickness reproducibility was greater in allmeasured areas except the superior quadrant, where no significantdifference was found Table 1: Comparison of Shrout Fleiss coefficients between version1 and version 2 

Table 2: Paired t–test results indicating the differencebetween version 1 and version 2 for all subjects Conclusions: Overall, version 2 of the OCT Stratus softwareanalysis has less variability than the previous version.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • nerve fiber layer • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×