May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Pressure/flow characteristics of a novel miniature glaucoma implant
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Ben–Hur
    Clinical Affairs,
    Optonol Ltd, Neve Ilan, Israel
  • S. Ben–Rimon
    Research and Development,
    Optonol Ltd, Neve Ilan, Israel
  • M. Liberman
    Research and Development,
    Optonol Ltd, Neve Ilan, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Ben–Hur, Optonol E; S. Ben–Rimon, Optonol E; M. Liberman, Optonol E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5550. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Ben–Hur, S. Ben–Rimon, M. Liberman; Pressure/flow characteristics of a novel miniature glaucoma implant . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5550.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The Ex–PRESS (Optonol, Israel) is a miniature unvalved, flow–restricting glaucoma implant. The device is a 3mm–long tube, with a 400µm external diameter that is made of implantable stainless steel approved for medical and ophthalmic applications. An indwelled unit inside the cannula serves to restrict flow. The purpose of this study was to test the pressure/flow characteristics of this device at physiologic flow rate (2µL/min), under controlled in–vitro conditions. Methods: All testing were done with devices in which the lumen was restricted to different extends (19±16µm, 26±14µm, 45±16µm, and 203±18µm), designated as R20, R30, R50, and R200, respectively. The following tests have been conducted: Gravity flow test – to calculate the theoretical resistance to flow and Constant flow test – to evaluate the pressure/flow characteristics of the device under constant flow rate. Data was compared to expected values calculated using the Possilles formula. Results: The mean values of pressure gradient measured at a physiologic flow rate were 1.05±0.16, 0.69±0.12, 0.18±0.02, and 0.014±0.001 mmHg, for the R20, R30, R50, and R200 devices, respectively. The correspondence resistance values are presented below: 

Conslusion: The study demonstrates that it is possible to control the dimensions of a manufactured lumen in a miniature glaucoma implant accurately enough to provide consistent restriction to flow. It was shown that the measured resistance to flow correlated with the inner diameter of the device and corresponded to the theoretical values that were obtained by the gravity flow tests. In this respect, the Ex–PRESS is an implant with an effective reproducible resistance to flow, which meets a prerequisite to gain acceptance as an effective glaucoma drainage device.

Keywords: clinical laboratory testing • aqueous • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×