May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
A Prospective Comparison of Patient Preference With Two Topical Timolol Preparations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • W. Haw
    UCSD, San Diego, CA
  • S. Byrd
    Corvalis, OR
  • K. Singh
    Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  • T. Tran
    Anaheim, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  W. Haw, Allergan C; S. Byrd, None; K. Singh, Santen Inc. C; T. Tran, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5569. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      W. Haw, S. Byrd, K. Singh, T. Tran; A Prospective Comparison of Patient Preference With Two Topical Timolol Preparations . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5569.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the compliance patterns andpatient preferences between two commonly administered once–a–daytopical preparations of timololMethods: 20 glaucoma patients were prospectively randomizedto administer timolol hemihydrate 0.5% solution (Betimol, SantenInc) in one eye and timolol maleate GFS 0.5% in the fellow eyeonce per day. Patients completed a questionnaire describingside effects and preferences at 30 minutes after the first administereddrop and at the conclusion of the 1 week study.Results: Table 1 Overall Patient Preference: % preferring each medication 

Table 2 Comfort Preference: % preferring each medication  Table 3 Vision Preference: % preferring each medication  Longer visual distortion was associated with the maleate GFSsolution by 10.0 +/– 4.9 min. 14 patients (70%) were willingto pay more to receive the hemihydrate solution.Conclusions: The timolol hemihydrate solution was associatedwith fewer symptoms of ocular discomfort and visual distortionthan the comparable maleate GFS solution. There was no adaptationto these symptoms after 1 week of treatment. This preferencehas the potential to impact patient compliance with glaucomatherapy and warrants further study.

Keywords: quality of life • pharmacology • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×