May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
The Effect of Topical Anesthetic Drops on Central Corneal Thickness Measurment and Intraocular Pressure Adjustment Values
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C.R. Niles
    Ophthalmology, State Univ of NY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
  • G.P. Barry
    State Univerity of NY at Buffalo, School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C.R. Niles, None; G.P. Barry, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5577. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C.R. Niles, G.P. Barry; The Effect of Topical Anesthetic Drops on Central Corneal Thickness Measurment and Intraocular Pressure Adjustment Values . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5577.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the effect of topical anesthetic drops on central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement using contact ultrasound pachymetry and its influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) adjustment. Methods: A prospective study involved 92 eyes of 46 non–glaucomatous patients, on no topical ocular medications and with no history of laser treatment or ocular surgery. CCT was measured without the use of topical anesthetic drops. CCT was then measured following one drop of topical anesthetic (proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution .5%) at 1 and 5 minute intervals. Three consecutive ultrasonic pachymetry (Quantel Medical) measurements of CCT were obtained and an average value was computed for each interval. Paired t–tests were then used to compare the differences in CCT between baseline (no anesthetic drop) and 1 minute post–anesthetic drop administration, and between baseline (no anesthetic drop) and 5 minute post–anesthetic drop administration. IOP adjustment values based on CCT at baseline, 1 min. and 5 min. intervals were determined using algorithm based on Ehlers et al (1975) modified from Stodimeister(1998). Paired t–tests were also used to compare the differences in IOP adjustment values between baseline and 1 min., and between baseline and 5 min. Results: The mean CCT was 559.39 +/– 3.21 µm at baseline, 561.76 +/– 3.26 µm at 1 min. after anesthetic, and 562.36 +/– 3.49 µm at 5 min. after anesthetic. The difference between mean CCT at 1 min. and baseline was 2.37 +/– .981 µm, which was statistically significant (p=.018). The difference between mean CCT at 5 min. and baseline was 2.97 +/– 1.284 µm, which was significant (p=.023). The mean IOP adjustment value was –.978 +/– .228 mmHg at baseline, –1.196 +/– .226mmHg at 1 min., and –1.239 +/– .246 mmHg at 5 min. The difference between mean IOP adjustment at 1 min. and baseline was –.228 +/– .082 mmHg, which was significant (p=.009). The difference between mean IOP adjustment at 5 min. and baseline was –.272 +/– .103 mmHg, which was also significant (p=.013). Conclusions:While the use of topical anesthetic drops appears to increase CCT with statistical significance, and also appears to be related to a statistically significant decrease in corrected IOP, this variation is smaller than the variability observed in IOP measurement (+/– 2 mmHg) by Goldman tonometry (Sudesh et al, 1993). The use of topical anesthetic drops to facilitate CCT measurement using contact ultrasonic pachymetry probably does not induce clinically significant error.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • cornea: clinical science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×