May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Treatment of rubeosis iridis with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin as a prophylaxis for Neovascular Glaucoma – a clinical study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V.A. Müller
    Ophthalmology, Augentagesklinik Spreebogen, Berlin, Germany
  • M. Schellenbeck
    Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinik Charite, Berlin, Germany
  • P. Ruokonen
    Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinik Charite, Berlin, Germany
  • M. Tetz
    Ophthalmology, Augentagesklinik Spreebogen, Berlin, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.A. Müller, None; M. Schellenbeck, None; P. Ruokonen, None; M. Tetz, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 5583. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V.A. Müller, M. Schellenbeck, P. Ruokonen, M. Tetz; Treatment of rubeosis iridis with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin as a prophylaxis for Neovascular Glaucoma – a clinical study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):5583.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To present results of a monocentre, open–lable, intra–individual controlled, pilot phase I/II, dose–finding study that was initiated to determine light dose parameters for photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in the setting of occlusion of neovascularization (NV) of the iris, secondary to ischemic retinopathy in patients who did not benefit from panretinal laser photocoagulation and who might develope a neovascular glaucoma (NVG) Methods: Treatment parameters for a single application of PDT with verteporfin were chosen based on drug– and light dose regimen tested for chorioidal NV and on the results of animal studies. Two opposite quadrants were treated with two different light doses, escalating from 12.5–100 J/cm². Depending on the angiographic effect on the vessels, the next higher light doses were applied to the next group of 3 patients.Primary outcome was defined as change on hyperfluorescence in angiography. Safety variables were: change in anterior chamber flare, IOP and visual acuity. Data were assessed for 3 month. Results: 9 patients (18 quadrants) have been treated . Closure of neovascular vessels could be achieved with a light dose of 50–100 J/cm². The higher the light dose the longer persistent the effect was. Safety variables did not show signf. changes. Conclusions: PDT with verteporfin appears to be capable to occlude NV of the iris secondary to ischemic retinopathy. Whether this vessel occlusion will have an impact on the progression of the rubeosis or NVG is subject of further investigation.

Keywords: photodynamic therapy • anterior segment • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×