May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Patient Satisfaction After Cataract Surgery With Multifocal Intraocular Lenses to Correct Presbyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.M. Nuyts
    Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • M.D. Nijkamp
    Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • J. De Brabander
    Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • B. van den Borne
    Maastricht Health Research Institute for Prevention and Care (HEALTH), University Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • F. Hendrikse
    Maastricht Health Research Institute for Prevention and Care (HEALTH), University Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.M. Nuyts, None; M.D. Nijkamp, None; J. De Brabander, None; B. van den Borne, None; F. Hendrikse, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 253. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.M. Nuyts, M.D. Nijkamp, J. De Brabander, B. van den Borne, F. Hendrikse; Patient Satisfaction After Cataract Surgery With Multifocal Intraocular Lenses to Correct Presbyopia . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):253.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Although monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are effective in improving vision after cataract surgery, the loss of accommodation is not restored by implantation of these IOLs. Since multifocal IOLs may improve uncorrected distance and near vision, we compared the clinical outcome and patient satisfaction after implantation of monofocal and multifocal IOLs. Besides outcome measures, socio-demographics, eagerness for spectacle independence (ESI), and neuroticism were tested as predictors of satisfaction. Methods: 75 patients with monofocal and 78 patients with multifocal IOLs were followed in a randomised controlled trial. Assessments were made preoperatively (t1), 3 months after first (t2) and 3 months after second eye surgery (t3). Primary outcomes consisted of near and distance visual acuity. Secondary outcomes related to spectacle dependence, vision related functioning and patient satisfaction. Results: Multifocal IOLs showed better uncorrected near visual acuity (p<0.01), higher quality ratings of unaided near vision over time (p<0.01), and reduced spectacle dependence at t3 for near (p=0.002) and distance (p=0.001). Monofocal IOLs showed less bother from cataract symptom scores (p< 0.001). Because of high preoperative expectations, the percentage of satisfied patients was relatively low: 62.5% in the monofocal and 61.5% in the multifocal group (p=NS). The perceived quality of corrected near vision had the strongest relationship with patient satisfaction (r=0.26, beta=0.22). Socio-demographics, ESI and neuroticism did not predict patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Although mono-and multifocal IOLs showed to have their own advantages and disadvantages, overall patient satisfaction did not differ between the two groups. Independent of ESI or neuroticism scores, success of both IOLs depends on preoperative expectations and postoperative quality of aided near vision.

Keywords: small incision cataract surgery • treatment outcomes of cataract surgery • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: tre 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×