May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Intraocular Pressure, Safety and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients Switching to Latanoprost from Adjunctive and Monotherapy Treatments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Wünsch
    Pharmacia GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
  • F. Haverkamp
    Children’s Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • G. Sand
    Eye Clinic, Ingoldstadt, Germany
  • M. Fuchs
    Eye Clinic, Ingoldstadt, Germany
  • W.C. Stewart
    Pharmaceutical Research Cooperation, Charlston, SC, and Carolina Eye Institute at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Wünsch, Pharmacia GmbH E; F. Haverkamp, None; G. Sand, None; M. Fuchs, Pharmacia GmbH E; W.C. Stewart, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 793. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Wünsch, F. Haverkamp, G. Sand, M. Fuchs, W.C. Stewart; Intraocular Pressure, Safety and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients Switching to Latanoprost from Adjunctive and Monotherapy Treatments . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):793.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate efficacy, safety and quality of life in ocular hypertensive or open-angle glaucoma patients changed to latanoprost from previous therapy. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, active controlled. Qualified patients had previous therapy substituted with latanoprost 0.005% and were followed for at least three months. Results: In 1068 patients latanoprost was persistent in 92.2% and reduced the intraocular pressure (IOP)(P < 0.001) when compared to previous monotherapies including: beta-blockers (-4.0 ± 3.7, n = 451), alpha-antagonists (-3.9 ± 3.0, n = 154), miotics (-3.8 ± 3.5, n = 21), or carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI)(-3.8 ± 3.6, n = 170), and adjunctive therapy including: beta-blocker and CAI (-3.7 ± 3.1, n = 133), alpha-agonist (-3.7 ± 3.4, n = 50), or pilocarpine (-3.4 ± 3.7, n = 62), or CAI and alpha-agonist (-4.6 ± 6.4, n = 25)(P = 0.0017). The most common adverse event with latanoprost was ocular allergy (1.5% incidence). Patients showed a preference for latanoprost for many quality of life measures (P < 0.05). Conclusions: : Latanoprost generally provides reduced IOP, limited side effects and many increased quality of life measures when substituted for other common mono- and adjunctive therapies

Keywords: intraocular pressure • pharmacology • quality of life 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×