May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Effect of Lisinopril on Retinal Blood Flow and Blood-Retinal Barrier Permeability in Type I Diabetes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G.T. Feke
    Ocular Circulation Laboratory, Schepens Retina Associates Foundation, Boston, MA, United States
  • J.W. McMeel
    Ocular Circulation Laboratory, Schepens Retina Associates Foundation, Boston, MA, United States
  • L.S. Hotes
    Department of Medicine, New England Sinai Hospital, Stoughton, MA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.T. Feke, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals F; J.W. McMeel, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals F; L.S. Hotes, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 956. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G.T. Feke, J.W. McMeel, L.S. Hotes; Effect of Lisinopril on Retinal Blood Flow and Blood-Retinal Barrier Permeability in Type I Diabetes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):956.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the effect of year-long treatment with the oral ACE Inhibitor lisinopril (10 mg per day) vs placebo on retinal blood flow and blood-retinal barrier permeability in a group of type I diabetic patients. Methods: We used a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel study design. Sixteen type I diabetic patients were recruited. Four were lost during follow-up. In the 12 patients that completed the study, average age was 30 years (range 19 to 44 years), average duration of diabetes was 10 years (range 3 to 17 years), and average age at onset was 20 years (range 8 to 36 years). Average length of follow-up was 11.4 months. Laboratory evaluations (HbA1c, serum potassium and creatinine, urinary microalbumin, and creatinine clearance) were performed at 3-month intervals. Ophthalmic evaluations, including retinal photography (ETDRS seven standard fields), retinal blood flow in a major temporal artery (Canon CLBF 100 laser Doppler instrument), and vitreous fluorophotometry (Ocumetrics Fluorotron Master), were performed at 6-month intervals. Nine patients had no observable retinopathy; 3 patients had retinal microaneurysms. Results: In the placebo group (n=8), retinal blood flow decreased by 15.6% ± 20.8% (mean ± sd) during follow-up. In the lisinopril group (n=4), retinal blood flow increased by 14.6% ± 10.9%. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.027, Mann-Whitney U-test). There were no significant effects of changes in blood pressure or heart rate on the changes in blood flow. Changes in blood-retinal barrier permeability as calculated using the method of Van Best and Vreeswijk were directly correlated with the changes in retinal blood flow (r = 0.67, p = 0.016, n=12). Finally, in the placebo group, the changes in retinal blood flow during follow-up were directly correlated with the patient age at onset of diabetes (r = 0.82, p = 0.012, n=8). Conclusions: The results confirm earlier published reports of progressive decreases in retinal blood flow in type I diabetic patients with no or minimal retinopathy. Treatment with lisinopril appears to reverse this process. The relation between blood flow and calculated blood-retinal barrier permeability changes suggests that permeability measurements alone, without regard to blood flow, must be interpreted with caution.

Keywords: blood supply • diabetes • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: tre 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×