May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Effects of the Pupil Constriction on the Wavefront Zernike Terms
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Gatinel
    Ophthalmology, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France
  • J. Malet
    Statistics, Institut de Statistiques Supérieures (ISUP), Paris, France
  • D.T. Azar
    Corneal and Refractive surgery, Massachussets Eye and Ear Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • T. Hoang-Xuan
    Corneal and Refractive surgery, Massachussets Eye and Ear Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Gatinel, None; J. Malet, None; D.T. Azar, None; T. Hoang-Xuan, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 966. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Gatinel, J. Malet, D.T. Azar, T. Hoang-Xuan; Effects of the Pupil Constriction on the Wavefront Zernike Terms . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):966.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To describe analytical formulas of the effect of the pupil constriction on the wavefront analysis using Zernike polynomials. Methods: The first 21 Zernike terms (up to the fifth radial order) were assigned arbitrary coefficients and independently analyzed as a function of the pupil diameter reduction factor S (S= pupil diameter/largest normalized pupil) using scalar products. The effects of reducing pupil size on all 21 Zernike coefficients were determined for each coefficient. Results: For coefficients of the 2nd -5th order terms, reducing the pupil size resulted in greater reductions of the Zernike coefficient (proportional to S2, S3, S4 and S5) for 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order terms, respectively. Additional coefficients of lower order were induced by pupil constriction for certain terms (coma inducing prism, spherical aberration inducing defocus, 5th order secondary coma inducing 3rd coma). Altering pupil diameter did not induce other terms when the only coefficient was of defocus, astigmatism and/or trefoil. Similar analysis was done for two higher even order rotationally- symmetric Zernike polynomials (Z60 and Z80) and resulted in induced defocus and spherical aberration upon pupil constriction. Conclusions: Pupillary constriction is beneficial in reducing optical aberrations by direct reducing of the Zernike coefficients. However, detrimental effect may be seen as a result of induced additional lower order coefficients.

Keywords: refractive surgery: optical quality • physiological optics • computational modeling 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×