May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Reproducibility in Grading Neovascular AMD Fluorescein Angiograms Using Digital vs. Film Imaging Modalities
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.A. Elledge
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • B.A. Blodi
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • C.J. Hiner
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • M.K. Webster
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • C.T. Hannan
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • L.D. Hubbard
    Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.A. Elledge, None; B.A. Blodi, None; C.J. Hiner, None; M.K.W. Webster, None; C.T. Hannan, None; L.D. Hubbard, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 1817. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.A. Elledge, B.A. Blodi, C.J. Hiner, M.K. Webster, C.T. Hannan, L.D. Hubbard; Reproducibility in Grading Neovascular AMD Fluorescein Angiograms Using Digital vs. Film Imaging Modalities . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):1817.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine grader agreement in identifying and classifying features of choroidal neovascular lesions in film versus digital fluorescein angiograms in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Nineteen patients from the University of Wisconsin ophthalmology clinic had both digital and film stereoscopic fluorescein angiograms taken of the same eye within a 10 day period. Two senior AMD graders at the Fundus Photograph Reading Center graded the digital angiograms and, two months later, graded the film angiograms. A mean grade was obtained from the two graders for the following variables: classic CNV, occult CNV, area of CNV, fluorescein leakage and blood. Results: Intermethod agreement for presence vs. absence of new vessels was 95% (K = .88) for classic CNV and 90% (K = .77) for occult CNV. The correlation coefficient for agreement on extent of new vessels was 0.89 for classic CNV, 0.74 for occult CNV and 0.71 for total CNV. The correlation coefficient for agreement on extent of leakage was 0.71 and for area of blood was 0.97. Conclusions: The variability observed between the digital and film fluorescein angiograms did not appear greater than the variability observed between graders evaluating film angiograms. With increasing use of digital angiography, evidence of its comparability to film angiography is reassuring.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • choroid: neovascularization • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×