May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Dynamic Aspects of Infants' Responses to Ramp Accommodative Stimuli
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G.M. Tondel
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
  • J. Wang
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
  • T.R. Candy
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.M. Tondel, None; J. Wang, None; T.R. Candy, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 1995. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G.M. Tondel, J. Wang, T.R. Candy; Dynamic Aspects of Infants' Responses to Ramp Accommodative Stimuli . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):1995.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Infants older than 3 months of age are able to detect and smoothly track a ramp accommodative target over a 3 D demand. The purpose for this study was to investigate the dynamics of infants' ramp responses. Methods: An eccentric videorefractor (PowerRefractor- Multichannel System) was used to sample accommodative responses of 7 to 19 week-olds and pre-presbiopic adults (as a comparison group). Measurements were taken at a frequency of 25Hz while targets were smoothly ramped back and forth between viewing distances of 1m and 25cm. Results: Infants, over the full age-range, were able to detect and change their accommodation in response to the 3 D demand. The latency and duration of the responses varied from infant to infant and also across age. Most infant responses were of shorter duration for negative than positive accommodation. This pattern was not found in the adults. The amplitude of accommodation was either matched or larger than the stimulus demand, and some infants initially accommodated in the incorrect direction. Conclusions: Young infants have the motor and sensory capacities to make positive and negative accommodative responses to ramp stimuli moving at 1D/sec. The variability in responses latency and duration could reflect the role of attention. The asymmetry in duration of positive and negative responses will be discussed in the context of depth of focus predictions.

Keywords: visual development • accommodation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×