May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Idiosyncratic Number Use is a Source of Inter-observer Variability in Glaucomatous Optic Disc Assessment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.B. Flynn
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
  • T. Realini
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
  • J.B. Pittenger
    Psychology, Univ. of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.B. Flynn, None; T. Realini, None; J.B. Pittenger, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2179. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.B. Flynn, T. Realini, J.B. Pittenger; Idiosyncratic Number Use is a Source of Inter-observer Variability in Glaucomatous Optic Disc Assessment . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2179.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Idiosyncratic number use is a well-documented psychophysical phenomenon that describes some observers' inconsistency in estimating the relative magnitudes of a range of stimuli (ie, nonlinear scaling). This study investigates whether idiosyncratic number use in cup/disc (C/D) ratio assessment accounts for some of the inter-observer variability associated with this task. Methods: 21 ophthalmologists viewed and assigned C/D ratios to a series of optic disc photographs spanning the spectrum from C/D 0.1 to 0.9. They also viewed a series of straight lines of various lengths, and assigned to each line a number that corresponded to their impression of the line's magnitude. From the line length data, we determined each observer's deviation from perfect judgment of relative magnitudes (ie, idiosyncratic number use). We then assessed the observers' accuracy in judging C/D ratios before and after mathematically correcting judgments based on each observer's extent of idiosyncratic number use. Results: Before correction for idiosyncratic number use, the slope of the regression function arising by plotting judged C/D ratio against true C/D ratio was 0.84 (perfect agreement would give a slope of 1.0). After correction for idiosyncratic number use, the slope improved to 0.90 (p<0.05 by paired t-test). Conclusions: Idiosyncratic number use accounts for some of the inter-observer variability in the clinical assessment of C/D ratio.

Keywords: optic disc • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: sys • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×