May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Comparison of Clinically Relevant Response Rates to Bimatoprost and Latanoprost in Patients with Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N.T. Choplin
    Eye Care of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
  • M.S. Dirks
    Black Hills Regional Eye Institute, Rapid City, SD, United States
  • M. Tepedino
    Cornerstone Research Care, High Point, NC, United States
  • A. Batoosingh
    Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • P. Bernstein
    Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • S.M. Whitcup
    Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • Bimatoprost/Latanoprost Study Group
    Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N.T. Choplin, Allergan, Inc. C, R; M.S. Dirks, Allergan, Inc. C, R; M. Tepedino, Allergan, Inc. F; A. Batoosingh, Allergan, Inc. E; P. Bernstein, Allergan, Inc. E; S.M. Whitcup, Allergan, Inc. E.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2214. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N.T. Choplin, M.S. Dirks, M. Tepedino, A. Batoosingh, P. Bernstein, S.M. Whitcup, Bimatoprost/Latanoprost Study Group; Comparison of Clinically Relevant Response Rates to Bimatoprost and Latanoprost in Patients with Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2214.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Patterns for open angle glaucoma (2000) suggest that an initial target pressure for newly diagnosed glaucoma patients be at least 20% below baseline intraocular pressure (IOP). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% with latanoprost 0.005% in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma. This analysis was done to compare the percentage of patients in each treatment group that achieved at least a 20% decrease from baseline in IOP after receiving bimatoprost 0.03% or latanoprost 0.005%. Methods: This was a multicenter, investigator-masked, 6-month randomized clinical trial. After washout of currently used glaucoma medications, patients were randomly assigned to once daily bimatoprost 0.03% (n = 133) or latanoprost 0.005% (n = 136) administered in the evening. IOP was measured at week 1 and months 1, 3, and 6 at 8AM, 12PM and 4PM. Percentages of patients achieving at least 15% and 20% IOP reductions from baseline at all timepoints for each visit were calculated for each group and the percentages compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: The percentages of patients who achieved ≥ 20% IOP decrease from baseline at all measurements on a given visit were 68.4% in the bimatoprost group and 41.2% in the latanoprost group (P<.001) at week 1, 66.9% in the bimatoprost group and 47.1% in the latanoprost group (P = .001) at month 1, 60.2% in the bimatoprost group and 43.4% in the latanoprost group (P = .007) at month 3, and 57.9% in the bimatoprost group and 36.0% in the latanoprost group (P<.001) at month 6. At each visit, a greater percentage of bimatoprost patients than latanoprost patients also achieved at least a 15% IOP decrease from baseline at all measurements (P<.001). Conclusions: Patients on bimatoprost were significantly more likely than patients on latanoprost to achieve clinically relevant decreases from baseline IOP throughout the day.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: tre 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×