May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Functional Outcome of Endonasal versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.R. Malik
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • M.A. Elgohary
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • M. Toma
    Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth 2 Hospital, Herdfordshire, United Kingdom
  • A. McElvanney
    Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth 2 Hospital, Herdfordshire, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.R. Malik, None; M.A. Elgohary, None; M. Toma, None; A. McElvanney, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2422. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.R. Malik, M.A. Elgohary, M. Toma, A. McElvanney; Functional Outcome of Endonasal versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2422.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare the outcome of endonasal DCR (End-DCR) to external DCR (Ext-DCR). Methods: As part of an audit, the medical notes of all patients who underwent End-DCR (n=14) at a general ophthalmic unit were reviewed and the functional results compared to a contemporary age-matched group who had ext-DCR (n=12). Both procedures were done under general anaesthesia and silicone tubes were used in all cases. Patients follow-up was for a minimum of 4 months and epiphora was evaluated subjectively using Munk's grading questionnaire. Results: Patients were comparable in their preoperative Munk's grade (p=0.97). Both En-DCR and Ext-DCR procedures significantly reduced patients' grade of epiphora (p= 0.01and 0.008, respectively). Postoperatively, 64% in the En-DCR versus 67% in the Ext-DCR had symptomatic improvement and no significant difference was found in the proportion of patients attaining substantial improvement i.e. Munk's grades 0 or 1between the two groups (31% vs. 50%; p=0.4). Conclusion: Both procedures of DCR are comparable in reducing patients' symptom of epiphora through effectively improving tear drainage function and hence the choice of the procedure should be based on surgeon's expertise and patient preference.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: out • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: sys • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.