May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Lasik: Bitoric Ablation for the Correction of Mixed Astigmatism
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Stangogiannis
    Ophthalmology, APEC, Mexico, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Stangogiannis, None.
  • Footnotes
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2590. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Stangogiannis; Lasik: Bitoric Ablation for the Correction of Mixed Astigmatism . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2590.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and predictibility of a bitoric approach for the correction of mixed astigmatism by LASIK. To determine the best strategy to estimate the desired correction (subjective and/or cycloplegic refraction). Methods: Prospective, experimental, longitudinal and comparative study that included eyes with mixed astigmatism.Cases were randomly assigned to the following groups: A) Cycloplegic refraction for both, the sphere and cylinder; B) Average of the subjective and cycloplegic refractions for the sphere, and subjective refraction for the cylinder; C) Subjective refraction for both, the sphere and cylinder. All surgeries were performed with a VISX STAR S2 excimer laser (VISX Inc. Sacred Clara, C.A). Patients were excamined at first and third month postoperatively. Results: 37 patients (60 eyes) were included with an average age of 32 years old (range 19-61). Postoperative UCVA, BCVA, refractions (subjective and cycloplegic) showed no significant difference between groups. After surgery, UCVA was 20/30 or better in 75, 50 and 53.3 % in group A, B and, C, respectively. No lines of BCVA were lost. Average postoperative sphere was –1.20 D for group A, -1.52 D for group B and, –0.65 D for group C. Average postoperative cylinder was 1.44 D for group A, 1.43 D for group B and 2.06 D for group C. No postoperative complications were found in any group. Conclusion: Bitoric treatment based on cycloplegic refraction appears to be a better approach for the correction of mixed astigmatism.

Keywords: laser • astigmatism • refractive surgery: PRK 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.