May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Interexaminer and Intraexaminer Reliability of Pupil Diameter Measurement using the Colvard Pupillometer
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Yoon
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco / Francis I. Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • G. Schmidt
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • T. Lietman
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • S.D. McLeod
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Yoon, None; G. Schmidt, None; T. Lietman, None; S.D. McLeod, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2595. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Yoon, G. Schmidt, T. Lietman, S.D. McLeod; Interexaminer and Intraexaminer Reliability of Pupil Diameter Measurement using the Colvard Pupillometer . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2595.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the interexaminer and intraexaminer agreement of pupil size diameter measurements determined using the Colvard pupillometer. Methods: The right eyes of 69 patients were examined (T1) using the Colvard pupillometer under low light and dark conditions (mesopic and scotopic) by two examiners, and repeated 1 hour (T2) and 24 hours (T3) later. The limits of agreement (mean difference between measurements ± 2 standard deviations) were calculated for measurements between examiners (interexaminer agreement) and between different time points measured by the same examiner (intraexaminer agreement). Z-values were also calculated to measure the associated probability that a given measurement difference was less than a specified interval distance (within 0.5 mm). Results: At T1, there was a 98.4% and 93.4% chance of two different examiners producing readings within 0.5mm under mesopic and scotopic conditions, respectively. There was a 13.7% chance and a 14.8% chance of finding a pupil difference greater than 0.50 mm over one hour under mesopic and scotopic conditions respectively. For mesopic and scotopic measurements taken 24 hours apart, there was respectively a 37.7 % chance and a 40.7% chance of finding a difference greater than 0.50 mm by the same examiner. Conclusions: This study showed high interexaminer agreement under scotopic conditions, with 98.4% agreement within 0.50 mm between two examiners, but substantial variability in a given patient's pupil diameter measurements over 24 hours. These results suggest that serial office measurements may be necessary to assess risk associated with pupil size.

Keywords: refractive surgery: LASIK • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: sys • pupil 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×