May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Recovery of the Rod Photoresponse in Infants
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.M. Hansen
    Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, United States
  • A.B. Fulton
    Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.M. Hansen, None; A.B. Fulton, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY 10597
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2817. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.M. Hansen, A.B. Fulton; Recovery of the Rod Photoresponse in Infants . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2817.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose:Test the hypothesis that the kinetics of recovery of the rod photoresponse in young infants differ significantly from those of adults. During development, the gain of the processes involved in the activation of phototransduction is scaled by rhodopsin content, and the ratio of gain to saturated amplitude is invariant with age. Infants have short rod outer segments and low rhodopsin content. Methods:Recovery of the rod photoresponse was studied using a paired flash paradigm. Subjects were infants aged 4-weeks (N=11), 10-weeks (N=11), and adults (N=8). Full field ERG a-wave responses to a bright, saturating probe flash (+3.6 log scot td sec) were recorded at 8 selected intervals (1 to 120 sec) after a test flash (+3.6 log scot td sec). Between each test-probe pair, 2 minutes in the dark were allowed. At each interval, the amplitude of the response to the probe was expressed as the percent of the response to the probe alone. The time (t50) at which the amplitude was 50% was determined. Results: For every subject, an exponential function describes the recovery of the photoresponse (% amplitude vs inter-flash interval). The t50 values of infants are significantly longer (F=13.9, df: 2,27; p<0.01) and more variable than those of adults. The median t50 values are: 4- weeks, 11 (range 7 to 23) sec; 10 weeks, 7 (range 4 to 14) sec; adults, 3 (range: 2 to 5) sec. Furthermore, across all ages, t50 values are inversely proportional to the gain of activation of phototransduction. Conclusions:Recovery of the photoresponse inferred from ERG responses to full field stimuli is slower and more variable in infants than adults. Possibly the randomness of inactivation of R* is greater in immature than in mature rods.

Keywords: electroretinography: non-clinical • visual development: infancy and childhood • photoreceptors 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.