May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Evaluation of Surgical Procedures for Retinal Detachment with Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Resulting from Myopic Macular Hole
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. Uemoto
    Ophthalmology, Toho Univ Sankura Hosp, Sakura, Japan
  • S. Yamamoto
    Ophthalmology, Toho Univ Sankura Hosp, Sakura, Japan
  • T. Yamamoto
    Ophthalmology, Toho Univ Sankura Hosp, Sakura, Japan
  • I. Tsukahara
    Ophthalmology, Toho Univ Sankura Hosp, Sakura, Japan
  • S. Takeuchi
    Ophthalmology, Toho Univ Sankura Hosp, Sakura, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R. Uemoto, None; S. Yamamoto, None; T. Yamamoto, None; I. Tsukahara, None; S. Takeuchi, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2983. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. Uemoto, S. Yamamoto, T. Yamamoto, I. Tsukahara, S. Takeuchi; Evaluation of Surgical Procedures for Retinal Detachment with Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Resulting from Myopic Macular Hole . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2983.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal, combined with or without macular buckling for a retinal detachment (RD) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) resulting from a macular hole (MH) in highly myopic eyes. Methods: A retrospective nonrandomized study was conducted at a single institution. Surgical results in 15 consecutive eyes with RD complicated with PVR were studied. PPV with ERM removal and macular buckling was performed on 6 eyes (buckling group), and PPV with ERM removal alone was performed on 9 eyes (non-buckling group). Main outcome measures were the anatomical reattachment rate and visual acuity (VA). Follow-up periods were more than 12 months in all cases. Results: The anatomic success rate was significantly higher in the buckling group (100%) than in the non-buckling group (44.4%; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the postoperative visual acuity, and the increase of visual acuity in the two groups (P=0.09 and P=0.54, respectively). Conclusions: These results suggest that PPV combined with ERM removal and macular buckling may not only release the tangential traction over the detached retina, but also enforce the adhesion of the myopic retina, seal the MH completely, and lead to the complete reattachment of the retina.

Keywords: retinal detachment • macular holes • myopia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×