May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Visual Outcome after Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Membrane Peeling in Patients with Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Related Cystoid Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Chen
    Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States
  • K.A. Warren
    Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States
  • F.S. Jehan
    Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States
  • J.R. Dicostanzo
    Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Chen, None; K.A. Warren, None; F.S. Jehan, None; J.R. Dicostanzo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 3029. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Chen, K.A. Warren, F.S. Jehan, J.R. Dicostanzo; Visual Outcome after Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Membrane Peeling in Patients with Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Related Cystoid Macular Edema . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):3029.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and membrane peeling (Mx) in patients with diabetic versus nondiabetic related cystoid macular edema (CME). Methods: The charts of 24 patients with 26 CME eyes underwent PPV and Mx between 1997 to 2002 were reviewed. The logMAR equivalent was used to calculate average mean visions. The patients were self-paired to compare the mean vision pre and post operatively. The paired T-test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the mean visions before and after surgery. Student T test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the increased visions in the eyes with or without diabetic related CME. Results: Mean visions (mean± SD) The post-op logMAR equivalent vision was significantly increased (P=0.019) for all 26 CME eyes and was more significantly increased (P=0.004) in eyes with nondiabetic related CME. However, the post-op logMAR equivalent vision in eyes with diabetic related CME was not significantly increased (P=0.80). The logMAR equivalent vision increase between the diabetic and nondiabetic related CME eyes was significant different (P=0.026). Conclusions: In 26 patients with CME who underwent PPV and Mx, the visual outcome appears significantly different in patients based on the absence or presence diabetic related CME. The post-op vision was significant increased in patient with nondiabetic related macular edema while no significant change in vision was demonstrated in patients with diabetic related CME.  

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • retina • diabetes 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×