May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Circle Versus Ellipse: A Comparison of GDx Measurements Obtained by Using Two Different Optic Disc Marking Methods
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Wong
    Glaucoma Division, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • M.J. Sinai
    Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, CA, United States
  • D. Garway-Heath
    Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, CA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Wong, None; M.J. Sinai, Laser Diagnostic Technologies E; D. Garway-Heath, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 3377. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Wong, M.J. Sinai, D. Garway-Heath; Circle Versus Ellipse: A Comparison of GDx Measurements Obtained by Using Two Different Optic Disc Marking Methods . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):3377.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare the utility of employing a peripapillary circle of fixed diameter against the standard operator-marked ellipse, when analysing scanning laser polarimeter images. Methods: Fifty-six normal eyes and 55 glaucomatous eyes were imaged using the GDx with a Variable Corneal Compensator. Retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness was measured with the ellipse and with a circle of fixed diameter (85 pixels) centred around the disc. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for all parameters. Results: For both populations, the circle method resulted in lower average thickness values (paired sample t-test; p<0.001). This method also produced less inter-individual variability for RNFL thickness and most of the summary output measures in normal eyes. The area under the ROC curve for the most discriminating parameters was larger for the fixed circle. Conclusions: The fixed circle method may have better discriminating capability than the ellipse for GDx measurements, and its relative simplicity may reduce inter-operator variability.

Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×