May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Co-expression of UV- and M- Cone Opsins in Photoreceptors of Nrl-/- Mouse
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.L. Daniele
    Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • S.S. Nikonov
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • A.L. Lyubarsky
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • A.J. Mears
    Ophthalmology & Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • A. Swaroop
    Ophthalmology & Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • E.N. Pugh, Jr.
    Ophthalmology & Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.L. Daniele, None; S.S. Nikonov, None; A.L. Lyubarsky, None; A.J. Mears, None; A. Swaroop, None; E.N. Pugh, Jr., None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY02660, NIH Grant EY11115, RPB Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 3528. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.L. Daniele, S.S. Nikonov, A.L. Lyubarsky, A.J. Mears, A. Swaroop, E.N. Pugh, Jr.; Co-expression of UV- and M- Cone Opsins in Photoreceptors of Nrl-/- Mouse . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):3528.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine if Nrl-/- mouse photoreceptors express both UV- & M- cone pigments. Background: Nrl-/- mice have photoreceptors that do not express rod-specific proteins (1), and which may therefore be tentatively classified as "cones". Methods: Single cell photocurrents in response to brief light flashes varying in wavelength from 360 nm to 650 nm were measured with suction electrodes. The a-wave component of the ERG was measured in response to 1 ms flashes varying from 350 nm to 450 nm. Results: The action spectrum of the a-wave rising phase peaked at about 360 nm and is clearly dominated by cells expressing the UV-pigment; we were unable to measure a-wave responses beyond 450 nm. All single cells recorded from were maximally sensitive in the UV, but also exhibited a distinct secondary mode of sensitivity at 500-510 nm; sensitivity at the secondary mode ranged from 0.1% to 2% that of the primary mode at 360 nm. (We can reliably detect M-pigment co-expression above 0.01% as deviation of the action spectrum from a UV-pigment template). Conclusions: Most (if not all) Nrl-/- photoreceptors co-express both the murine M-cone and UV-cone pigments, but the co-expression (in cells recorded to date) does not exceed 2%. Comparison with results of our previous ERG study (2), suggests that most "UV cones" of wildtype mice may co-express higher levels of M-cone pigment than do the UV photoreceptors of the Nrl-/- mouse. 1 Mears, et al. (2001) Nature Genetics, 29:447-452. 2 Lyubarsky et al. (1999) J. Neuroscience, 19(1): 442-455.

Keywords: color pigments and opsins • photoreceptors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×