May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Corneal Reepithelialization Rates following Application of Bandage Contact Lens and Eye Lid Tarsorraphy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.M. Fowler
    CEENTA, Charlotte, NC, United States
  • B.C. Roberts
    Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
  • W.C. Fowler
    Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
  • A.D. Proia
    Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.M. Fowler, None; B.C. Roberts, None; W.C. Fowler, None; A.D. Proia, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  ONR Grant N00014-94-1-0818
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 3819. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.M. Fowler, B.C. Roberts, W.C. Fowler, A.D. Proia; Corneal Reepithelialization Rates following Application of Bandage Contact Lens and Eye Lid Tarsorraphy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):3819.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Our previous work demonstrated that wound healing (reepithelialization, stromal remodeling and scar formation) in the White Leghorn chicken cornea is similar to that observed in humans, making the chicken a viable animal model for corneal wound healing investigations. Additionally, using this animal model we have shown patching techniques (a traditional treatment method for corneal epithelial abrasions) to slow reepithelialization compared to untreated controls (p<0.004). This study objectively quantifies reepithelialization times and corneal epithelial cell crawling rates on wounded corneas treated with either a bandage contact lens (BCL) or an eyelid tarsorraphy (TAR). Methods: : Eighteen adult female White Leghorn chickens were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: untreated control, BCL and TAR. The right corneas of each subject had a 5 mm diameter zone debrided centrally using a Gills’ blade. Following debridement the appropriate treatment was applied and the subjects were followed by fluorescein photography every 4 hours until reepithelialization was achieved. Using a computerized image analysis system, epithelial defect areas were quantified at each time point and appropriate statistical analysis performed. Results: The epithelial defect healing times in both the TAR (36hrs) and BCL (36hrs) treatment groups were significantly shorter than controls (44hrs) (p<0.0001 for both). Additionally, the corneal epithelial cell crawling rate in both the TAR and BCL treatment groups was significantly faster than controls at 125% of the control rate (p<0.0025 for both). Conclusions: Bandage contact lens and eye lid tarsorraphy improved healing times for corneal epithelial defects compared to controls and the traditionally used pressure patch. Furthermore, the use of a bandage contact lens to treat corneal epithelial defects allows the subject to continue to use the injured eye during healing, an advantage not present in any of the other treatments tested.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • wound healing • contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×