May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Patients With Visual Field Defects Experience Pseudo-Hallucinations During Spontaneous and Training-Induced Recovery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.A. Poggel
    Generation Research Program, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Bad Toelz, Germany
  • E.M. Mueller-Oehring
    Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
  • J. Gothe
    Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
  • S. Kenkel
    Nova Vision Center for Visual Therapy, Magdeburg, Germany
  • E. Kasten
    Nova Vision Center for Visual Therapy, Magdeburg, Germany
  • B.A. Sabel
    Nova Vision Center for Visual Therapy, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.A. Poggel, None; E.M. Mueller-Oehring, None; J. Gothe, None; S. Kenkel, Nova Vision Center for Visual Therapy E; E. Kasten, None; B.A. Sabel, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 4096. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.A. Poggel, E.M. Mueller-Oehring, J. Gothe, S. Kenkel, E. Kasten, B.A. Sabel; Patients With Visual Field Defects Experience Pseudo-Hallucinations During Spontaneous and Training-Induced Recovery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):4096.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Visual pseudo-hallucinations have been observed in 10-15% of patients suffering from visual system lesions during spontaneous recovery. We investigated whether those illusions also occur during visual restitution training (VRT), a computer-based treatment for the detection of white light stimuli at the visual field border. The phenomenology of training-induced illusions was compared to pseudo-hallucinations during spontaneous recovery. Methods: In a prospective study, perimetric baseline examinations before and after a period of six months of VRT were performed as well as repeated interviews in a group of 19 patients with post-genicular lesions performed. A separate group of 119 patients with different pre- and post-genicular lesions who had done VRT answered a questionnaire on pseudo-hallucinations after training. Results: In the prospective trial, 52.6% of the patients had experienced mainly complex visual illusions during spontaneous recovery (moving, colored, geometrical forms, real objects, or scenes). During training, significantly more patients reported pseudo-hallucinations, but only those who had perceived those phenomena after the lesion. Training-induced illusions were usually simple (white flashes or spots). They were temporally and topographically associated with functional recovery. In the larger sample, 36.4% had perceived pseudo-hallucinations in the context of the lesioning event, and 15.4% reported training-induced illusions. Pseudo-hallucinations during treatment occurred significantly more often in those patients who reported an increase of visual field size. Conclusions:Most likely, visual illusions reflect spontaneous activity in (partially) lesioned brain areas which may be the basis for functional recovery. After a lesion, large areas of visual cortex show spontaneous activation, generating mostly complex illusions. During VRT, V1 is specifically activated, triggering more simple pseudo-hallucinations associated with training-induced visual field increase.

Keywords: plasticity • neuro-ophthalmology: cortical function/rehabil • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×