May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Accommodation after Image Blur Adaptation in Myopes and Emmetropes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.E. Gwiazda
    Vision Science, New England College Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
  • F.A. Vera-Diaz
    Vision Science, New England College Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
  • R. Held
    Vision Science, New England College Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
  • F. Thorn
    Vision Science, New England College Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.E. Gwiazda, None; F.A. Vera-Diaz, None; R. Held, None; F. Thorn, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH/NEI grant EY 01191
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 4784. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.E. Gwiazda, F.A. Vera-Diaz, R. Held, F. Thorn; Accommodation after Image Blur Adaptation in Myopes and Emmetropes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):4784.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Prolonged exposure to blurred images has been shown to produce perceptual adaptation (Webster et al, 2002). The purpose of this study was to test whether the reported change in perceived blur produced by exposure to blurred images was accompanied by a change in accommodation. Method: Young adult (18 to 31 yrs) myopic (n = 17) and emmetropic (n = 9) subjects participated in the study. Myopes were tested with contact lenses and had corrected monocular VAs of 20/20 or better. Accommodation was measured binocularly with the Power Refractor, an eccentric infrared photorefractor. Accommodation for a near target (high contrast text at 0.3 m) was measured every 0.04 seconds for 2 minutes before and immediately after 3 minutes of blur exposure, as well as during blur adaptation. Blur was induced using 80% density diffusing occluders in front of both eyes. In addition, accommodation was measured for a far target (high contrast letters at 4.0 m) before and after the near measurements, with each subject's initial far readings used as a baseline for calculating the accommodative responses at near. Results: Compared to the pre-adapatation level, myopes showed a significant (t = 3.03, p = 0.008) increase in the accommodative response at near after 3 minutes of blur adaptation, while accommodation to the near target in emmetropes did not change. Overall, the difference in accommodation at near from pre- to post-adaptation was significantly greater for myopes than for emmetropes (F = 6.05, p = 0.02). Conclusions: The refractive group differences in accommodative response may be related to differences in the habitual response to image clarity between myopes and emmetropes under normal viewing conditions. CR: None Support: NIH/NEI grant EY01191

Keywords: accommodation • myopia • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×