May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Do Referral Practices in Pediatric Primary Care Settings Depend Upon Age and / or the Technique Used to Screen Vision?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • W.L. Marsh-Tootle
    Department of Optometry, Univ of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
  • T.C. Wall
    Department of Pediatrics, Univ of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
  • J.M. Hardin
    Department of Statistics, Univ of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States
  • H.H. Evans
    Department of Statistics, Univ of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  W.L. Marsh-Tootle, None; T.C. Wall, None; J.M. Hardin, None; H.H. Evans, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  UAB HSF-GEF to T.C. Wall
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 4849. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      W.L. Marsh-Tootle, T.C. Wall, J.M. Hardin, H.H. Evans; Do Referral Practices in Pediatric Primary Care Settings Depend Upon Age and / or the Technique Used to Screen Vision? . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):4849.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine whether vision screening referral practices in pediatric primary care settings vary by age and / or technique. Methods: Children aged 3 to 18 years attending well-child visits in one of nine practices in Birmingham, AL were enrolled in the study following training sessions for nurses, research assistants and pediatricians on AAP vision screening guidelines or photo-screening. Nursing staff or medical students screened 2040 patients: 874 by visual acuity and 1166 by MTI photorefraction. Decisions to pass, re-check or refer were made by the primary care physician. Logistic regression was performed using the decision to refer as the dependent variable with co-variates including method type, patient demographics (age, gender, race, and insurance type), and academic affiliation of the practice. Results: The decision to refer was not influenced by any factor above except academic affiliation (more likely to refer, p=0.024). Less than half of preschool children obtained examinations after failing either screening technique (2/5, 40 % VA versus 26/71, 36.6% MTI). Conclusions: Primary care practices in academic settings are more likely to refer according to established protocols for visual acuity and photorefraction screening. Practices using photorefraction showed good agreement between screening results, referral decisions, and the estimated prevalence of abnormal refractive errors and strabismus at preschool ages. Practices using visual acuity showed large discrepancies, with fewer preschool children screened and referred than expected. Perhaps most surprising, primary care providers decided NOT to refer the vast majority of older children who did not pass visual acuity.  

Keywords: screening for ambylopia and strabismus • visual development: infancy and childhood 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×