May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Tissue Reaction and Biocompatibility Following Long-Term Implantation of Electrical Devices into the Subretinal Space of Cats and Pigs
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K.L. Kohler
    Experimental Ophthalmology, Univ. Eye Hospital, Tubingen, Germany
  • H. Sachs
    Univ. Eye Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
  • E. Zrenner
    Univ. Eye Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
  • H. Richter
    Institute of Pathology, RWTA, Aachen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K.L. Kohler, None; H. Sachs, None; E. Zrenner, None; H. Richter, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  German Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology #01KP0008
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 5071. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K.L. Kohler, H. Sachs, E. Zrenner, H. Richter; Tissue Reaction and Biocompatibility Following Long-Term Implantation of Electrical Devices into the Subretinal Space of Cats and Pigs . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):5071.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the status of the retina and RPE covering the inner and outer surface of microphotodiode arrays (MPDAs) implanted into the subretinal space. Methods: Following local retinal detachment and retinotomy, MPDAs were inserted into the subretinal space. After an implantation period of up to 15 months in cats and 29 months in Yucatan minipigs, eyes were enucleated and processed for histology. The implant was removed, serial sections were cut along the implantation area, and cell numbers and thickness of the retinal layers were quantified. Immunohistochemistry was used to monitor changes in the network of distinct neuronal cell types and in glia reactivity. Some implants were left in situ and processed as a combined tissue/device preparation. Results: Due to the blocked nutrition of the outer retina by the subretinal implant most of the photoreceptors overlying the implant degenerated. However, 1-3 rows of ONL-cells were still present more than 2 years after implantation in pigs and to a lesser extend also in cats. The preservation of the inner retina varies but was in general much better in pigs than in cats. Cell loss and hyperplasia of Muller glia was minimized in those areas where at least one row of ONL-cells remained. Inner and outer surfaces of all implants were covered with a fibrous membrane. This membrane was less than 10 µm thick in pigs. It occasionally accumulated to a coating thickness of several cell layers in cats and in animals with a post-operative edema or a delayed adherence of the retina to the surface of the implant. A massive fibrosis was accompanied by strong glia reactions and disturbances in the retinal architecture. The majority of the implanted animals developed only minimal fibrosis and mild fibrosis was always correlated with residues of ONL-cells. The neuronal network of horizontal, amacrine, and ganglion cells was well preserved and without substantial deficits in these retinas as shown by morphometry and immunohistochemistry. Disruption of the RPE and opening of the Blood-Retina-Barrier was closed by cell proliferation and formation of a fibrous scare. Conclusions: Our subretinal implants were well tolerated by the retina and RPE over more than two years in situ. The preservation of the inner retinal network indicates that signal procession is still possible after that period. A quick and proper attachment of the retina to the surface of the implant after surgery seems to be a crucial prerequisite to minimize the formation of fibrous membranes.

Keywords: retina • photoreceptors • animal model 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.