December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
The Effect of Inter- and Intra-observer Variability in the Definition of the Optic Disc Margin on HRT and GDx Parameters
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • AJ Kwartz
    Academic Department of Ophthalmology University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
  • AK Jones
    Academic Department of Ophthalmology University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
  • DB Henson
    Academic Department of Ophthalmology University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
  • RA Harper
    Academic Department of Ophthalmology University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
  • AF Spencer
    Academic Department of Ophthalmology University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A.J. Kwartz, None; A.K. Jones, None; D.B. Henson, None; R.A. Harper, None; A.F. Spencer, None. Grant Identification: NHS R&D Grant (HTA Project No: 95/18/04)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 247. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      AJ Kwartz, AK Jones, DB Henson, RA Harper, AF Spencer; The Effect of Inter- and Intra-observer Variability in the Definition of the Optic Disc Margin on HRT and GDx Parameters . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):247.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the effect of inter- and intra-observer variability in contour line placement on confocal scanning laser tomography and scanning laser polarimeter parameters. Methods: From a database of patients attending a longitudinal glaucoma study a single image with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) and Laser Diagnostic scanning laser polarimeter (GDx) was selected for 20 normals, 20 ocular hypertensives and 20 glaucoma patients. Five trained operators defined the disc margins and 3 repeated the measurements after ≷1 week. Six parameters were selected for each instrument and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) computed. Diagnostic category was also compared using the HRT discriminant analysis function and recommended interpretation of the GDx 'number'. Results: The table shows the ICC for each parameter. Inconsistency in diagnostic category between the 5 observers was found in 20 (HRT) and 15 (GDx) cases. There was no tendency for a specific group of patients be misclassified with either instrument (Chi-squared test). Intra-observer parameter variability for the 3 observers was: HRT (mean ICC (range)) 0.964 (0.920 - 0.988), 0.945 (0.853 - 0.982) and 0.687 (0.557 - 0.772) and GDx 0.986 (0.953 - 0.996), 0.990 (0.976 - 0.999) and 0.968 (0.907 - 0.999). Kappa statistic for agreement of the diagnostic category was: 0.897, 0.798 and 0.564 (HRT) and 0.827, 1.00 and 0.779 (GDx). Conclusion: Although good agreement was found between operators with both instruments, the diagnostic categorisation varied with contour line placement. Also, the range of intra-observer variability shows the importance of correctly establishing the disc margin if the instruments are used as clinical tools. Inter-observer agreement of HRT and GDx parameters  

Keywords: 430 imaging/image analysis: clinical • 498 optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×