December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Anisometropia and Degree of Optic Nerve Damage in Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A Soefker
    Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany
  • JB Jonas
    Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany
  • P Martus
    Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology Benjamin Franklin School of Medicine Free University of Berlin Berlin Germany
  • WM Budde
    Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital University Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A. Soefker, None; J.B. Jonas, None; P. Martus, None; W.M. Budde, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 283. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A Soefker, JB Jonas, P Martus, WM Budde; Anisometropia and Degree of Optic Nerve Damage in Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):283.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To address the question whether the refractive error plays a role in the amount of optic nerve damage in glaucoma, the purpose of the present study was to compare inter-eye differences in refractive error with inter-eye differences in parameters indicating the degree of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, and to compare interindividual differences in refractive error with interindividual differences in neuroretinal rim area and visualfield loss. Methods: The comparative clinical observational study included 1444 eyes of 876 patients with primary or secondary chronic open-angle glaucoma. Patients with a highly myopic refractive error exceeding -8 diopters were excluded due to differences in the anatomy of the optic nerve head. For all patients, color stereo optic disc photographs had been taken and were morphometrically evaluated. Main outcome measures were refractive error, neuroretinal rim area, horizontal and vertical cup/disc diameter ratios, and visual field loss. Result: In an interindividual statistical analysis, area of neuroretinal rim, horizontal and vertical cup/disc diameter ratios, and mean visual field loss were not significantly (P≷0.10) correlated with the refractive error. In an intraindividual comparison, inter-eye differences in refractive error were not significantly (P≷0.05) correlated with inter-eye differences in neuroretinal rim area and mean visual field defect. The eye with the more myopic refractive error and the contralateral eye with the less myopic refractive error did not vary significantly in neuroretinal rim area and mean visual field defect. Conclusion: For non-highly myopic patients with primary or secondary chronic open-angle glaucoma, the refractive error may not play a major role for the amount of glaucomatous optic neuropathy and myopia may not be an important risk indicator for glaucoma.

Keywords: 542 refraction • 498 optic disc • 624 visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×