December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Five Years Experience with the Capsular Tension Ring (CTR)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C Tribus
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • AJ Mueller
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • C-L Schoenfeld
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • S Priglinger
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • K Ludwig
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • A Kampik
    University Eye Hospital LMU Munich Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   C. Tribus, None; A.J. Mueller, None; C. Schoenfeld, None; S. Priglinger, None; K. Ludwig, None; A. Kampik, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 421. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C Tribus, AJ Mueller, C-L Schoenfeld, S Priglinger, K Ludwig, A Kampik; Five Years Experience with the Capsular Tension Ring (CTR) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):421.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Purpose of our study was to report the indication and clinical outcome of all CTR implantations in a large series of consecutive cataract surgeries during the last five years in a European university teaching hospital setting. Methods: We reviewed the records of 9528 consecutive cataract surgeries during the last five years for CTR implantation. The records were checked for indication and clinical outcome of CTR implantation. Results: In this series a CTR was implanted in 69 eyes of 67 patients; The indication was advanced or mature cataract in 40, posttraumatic cataract in 23, PEX in 4 and suluxated lens in 2 eyes. Intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was possible in 61 (90%) of 68 eyes in the capsular bag, and in 5 eyes (7%) in the sulcus region. Only twice (3%) an anterior chamber lens had to be inserted despite prior CTR implantation, one eye was left aphakic because of high myopia. In 5 eyes (7%) a slight decentration of the IOL was noted postoperatively, but none of these patients had a visually relevant decentration (e.g. monocular diplopia). Conclusion: We noted that CTR implantation is rarely necessary, but is useful in cataract surgeries with difficult preoperative or intraoperative conditions.If zonulolysis is less than two quadrants implantation of an IOL was possible in 98% of the eyes, in 90% even in the capsular bag. Implantation of CTRs with special designs may have additional advantages (e.g. inhibition of posterior capsule opacification) and warrant further investigation.

Keywords: 318 anterior segment • 338 cataract 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×